You're funny.
I'm - in turn - challenging you to show an allegation that specifically stated that he is a transexual.
I did state that he is a sodomite.
Ball's in your court (so to speak).
You affirmed the statement, “I know what Jim Hoft really needs to have cut off.”
It sounds like you’re affirming that Jim Hoft is trans. How else could that sentence be interpreted? Can you explain what, specifically, “needs to have cut off”?