Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: Red Badger
2 posted on
04/22/2024 9:04:45 AM PDT by
frogjerk
(More people have died trusting the government than not trusting the government.)
To: MtnClimber; SunkenCiv; mowowie; SuperLuminal; Cottonbay; RoosterRedux
Ping!........................
3 posted on
04/22/2024 9:04:49 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
To: Red Badger
Physics is magical... Magic is performed by witches and warlocks... Burn the witches and warlocks.
5 posted on
04/22/2024 9:10:20 AM PDT by
jerod
(Nazis were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
To: Red Badger
Sounds a bit quackery to me. But you never know.
Regardless, I do hope LGBTPRQST black Asian Muslim Latinx are fairly represented or it’s all invalid racism and micro aggression.
6 posted on
04/22/2024 9:10:49 AM PDT by
MeanWestTexan
(Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
To: Red Badger
“propellantless propulsion drive, which appears to defy the known laws of physics, has produced enough thrust to counteract Earth’s gravity”
let me guess: it somehow uses H2O and magnets ...
8 posted on
04/22/2024 9:11:05 AM PDT by
catnipman
(A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil)
To: Red Badger
I don’t think it’s its “propellant” that is what breaks laws, as a Crookes radiometer doesn’t have propellant, but used reflected, and absorbed, photons, as I recall.
The Crookes radiometer doesn’t defy Laws of Physics.
11 posted on
04/22/2024 9:15:22 AM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: Red Badger
from the article: “rubbing the latex balloon across the polyester sweater will generate enough static electricity to propel the spaceship at nearly ludicrous speed.” not
13 posted on
04/22/2024 9:17:33 AM PDT by
teeman8r
(Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
To: Red Badger
I can see the gravity of the matter.
5.56mm
19 posted on
04/22/2024 9:21:20 AM PDT by
M Kehoe
(Quid Pro Joe and the Ho have got to go. )
To: Red Badger
I’m a physics person myself. And I must admit that the article confused me. I would not be able to clearly explain Dr. Buhler’s method to anyone else. Maybe it’s because I’ve already had too much coffee today.
Anyway, I’ve already invented a workable propulsion system. It’s cheap, and very climate-friendly. Yet NASA ignores me. I guess I’m just not an insider like Dr. Buhler.
Here I am launching a volunteer towards the Moon.

22 posted on
04/22/2024 9:25:12 AM PDT by
Leaning Right
(The steal is real.)
To: Red Badger
"You’re just charging up Teflon, copper tape, and foam,"
I bet the foam is out gassing...
23 posted on
04/22/2024 9:25:37 AM PDT by
null and void
(Everyone on all sides a conflict will be happy to lie to you, except our side, of course!)
To: Red Badger
If they have really been able to produce enough thrust to overcome gravity, this would be a very big deal. Hopefully, it will scale. I'd be interested in knowing how much power is required to generate that much thrust.
24 posted on
04/22/2024 9:25:44 AM PDT by
zeugma
(Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
To: Red Badger
The fact that he can’t explain how the drive works in plain English but has to dance around it with technobabble as “new fundamental force” and “electrostatic pressures” automatically makes me think this is a con.
Also the use of the word “drive” and not “engine”.
If anything it sounds like they’re electrifying a plate of some sort and getting it to vibrate in harmonics which would give it a certain “lift” but I doubt would never get any amount of weight nothing more than a few mm off the ground.
25 posted on
04/22/2024 9:25:51 AM PDT by
Skywise
To: Red Badger
Dr. Charles Buhler, a NASA engineer 
26 posted on
04/22/2024 9:26:37 AM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Perfection is impossible. But if you pursue perfection...you may achieve excellence.)
To: Red Badger
“The Direct Conversion of Electrical Energy into Physical Thrust”
Oh no, battery-powered rockets. How many charging-station stops will the rocket have to make to get into orbit?
30 posted on
04/22/2024 9:44:23 AM PDT by
zipper
(In their heart of hearts, all Democrats are communists)
To: Red Badger
My shoes are good for 1 g. Almost there!
31 posted on
04/22/2024 9:50:07 AM PDT by
sasquatch
(Do NOT forget Ashli Babbit! c/o piytar)
To: Red Badger
33 posted on
04/22/2024 10:02:22 AM PDT by
NetAddicted
(MAGA2024)
To: Red Badger
One of two options will play out here:
Either the government has deemed us peasants ready for this disclosure and it is now necessary for some long-planned event; OR
The government swoops in to confiscate the device and research while the key scientists “suddenly” turn up missing or dead.
Just depends upon the participation of Dr. Buehler and pals with the government (are they in on the con or have they truly stumbled upon something that the powers that be do not want in the zeitgheist).
34 posted on
04/22/2024 10:06:11 AM PDT by
Buckeye Battle Cry
(Progressivism is socialism. Venezuela is how it ends.)
To: Red Badger
Let me know when they actually put this to use. Until then I am very reserved. If this is so doable then why haven’t they actually propelled something up up and away.
35 posted on
04/22/2024 10:07:30 AM PDT by
Revel
Buhler? Buhler? Buhler . . . ?
36 posted on
04/22/2024 10:20:33 AM PDT by
Olog-hai
("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
To: Red Badger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson