All I can guess is this: FISA can be used very wrongly, as in the fake Russian threat used against DJT. But FISA can be also used against AmCits who are collaborating with foreign entities against the Constitution of the US. FISA does indeed go both ways.
If so, it seems the good guys want to keep the warrantless searches against the very bad guys going - probably because warrant searches would tip them off, given the present state of our corrupt court system.
The Speaker meeting with POTUS Trump was very interesting. Why meet in person after all? Secure communications perhaps?
Finally shortly after changing his vote - the deciding vote - on warrantless searches, the Speaker noted that he did it based upon a highly classified intel briefing that he had received, and further that he wished all members could receive the same briefing.
I wonder if that briefing was the real reason for Mar a Lago...
All I can guess is this: FISA can be used very wrongly, as in the fake Russian threat used against DJT. But FISA can be also used against AmCits who are collaborating with foreign entities against the Constitution of the US. FISA does indeed go both ways.
If so, it seems the good guys want to keep the warrantless searches against the very bad guys going - probably because warrant searches would tip them off, given the present state of our corrupt court system.
The Speaker meeting with POTUS Trump was very interesting. Why meet in person after all? Secure communications perhaps?
Finally shortly after changing his vote - the deciding vote - on warrantless searches, the Speaker noted that he did it based upon a highly classified intel briefing that he had received, and further that he wished all members could receive the same briefing.
I wonder if that briefing was the real reason for Mar a Lago...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thank you, appreciate your views. Makes sense. And I’m sure Mar A Lago has a SCIF room.
The Speaker meeting with POTUS Trump was very interesting. Why meet in person after all? Secure communications perhaps?
Could Trump have asked him to keep FISA in place to use it against the dems after Jan?
Is this the same intel community that says it might not give Trump the usual presidential candidate security briefings? If, as you suggest, he later briefed DJT, wouldn't that turn it all on its ear? Does Mike Johnson trust the intel community more than he does the Holy Spirit and his own conscience?
Again, I wonder if the Swamp is leading the Speaker down the garden path - with flattery. 🤷