[MinorityRepublican]

Nothing to due with the Vax. Giving birth is still quite dangerous. That’s why expectant mothers give birth at the hospital.

[bray]

Check the increase in miscarriages after the vax.

[EEGator]

Being 40 increases all risks.

[Pontiac]

Nothing to due with the Vax. Giving birth is still quite dangerous. That’s why expectant mothers give birth at the hospital.

Yes, giving birth does have risk, I would not put it as quite dangerous’.

I would put on par with down hill skying.

But since the jab increases the risk of everything, how do you know that it doesn’t increase the risk of still birth?

[BobL]

“That’s why expectant mothers give birth at the hospital.”

My kids would not have a mom if we tried to be ‘cute’ with child birth, as #1 nearly killed her. And yes, she was FAR YOUNGER than 40 back then.

[ladyjane]

Giving birth is still quite dangerous. That’s why expectant mothers give birth at the hospital.

Ha! There was a time when giving birth at a hospital was the most dangerous place to be. Anybody who pointed it out was ostracized. Look at the history of childbirth.

[9YearLurker]

The dramatic rise in sepsis is indeed tied to the weakening of the immune system from the jabs (vaccine-associated acquired immune system deficiency, or VAIDS).

Here’s an article on its current prevalence:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13165721/sepsis-crisis-killer-infections-hospital.html

And here is Dr. James Thorpe discussing the association:

https://www.worldviewweekend.com/tv/video/why-one-american-dying-every-90-seconds-sepsis