Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global Warming Is Influencing Global Timekeeping
UC San Diego ^ | 3/27/24 | Robert Monroe

Posted on 03/27/2024 2:10:36 PM PDT by DallasBiff

A problem is coming for global timekeeping, according to a paper published in the March 27, 2024 issue of Nature by Duncan Agnew, a geophysicist at Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego, and global warming is influencing when that problem might arrive.

Worldwide coordination of timekeeping is how all smartphones and computers can keep the same time. This timekeeping includes, every so often, an extra second, called a leap second, which makes a particular minute last for 61 seconds. Anyone who has forgotten the change to or from daylight saving time and found themselves an hour early (or late) the next morning knows how confusing it is to be out of sync with everyone else’s time.

The same thing can happen with leap seconds: if a computer network doesn’t know about them, it will become out of sync with everything else. For example, if an online store’s computer and your bank’s computer keep different times, clicking the “order” button will appear to create two actions at different times, not just one.

(Excerpt) Read more at scripps.ucsd.edu ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; Weather
KEYWORDS: climatescam; gerbilsswarming; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; goebbelswarming; gorebullwarming; lajolla
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Oh gawd, what a bunch of over paid chicken littles.
1 posted on 03/27/2024 2:10:36 PM PDT by DallasBiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Finally, a really good response from us “deniers”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A24fWmNA6lM


2 posted on 03/27/2024 2:19:40 PM PDT by cuban leaf (2024 is going to be one for the history books, like 1939. And 2025 will be more so, like 1940-1945.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Uh, oh. The socialist bartender may need to be recalibrated.


3 posted on 03/27/2024 2:23:57 PM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

About time for me to post this again:

For those curious:

CO2 only absorbs infrared light aka heat in two very narrow bands of wavelengths (think “colors” of heat). In those narrow bands, CO2 is almost completely opaque.

Even at only 0.04% of our atmosphere, CO2 absorbs almost all infrared light in those bands within a few tens of meters. Hence, if you increased CO2 by even 10 times, the total amount of infrared light (again, heat) absorbed by the atmosphere would NOT CHANGE.

Think about it like this: You have 10,000 sheets of very thin semi-opaque paper. Each sheet abosbs 0.04% of light passing through it. That means those 10,000 sheets will aborb almost all of the light passing through them.

Note: the math is a little complicated. First sheet aborbs 0.04% of the light leaving 99.96% left. Next sheet abosorbs 0.04% of the remaining 99.96% leaving about 99.92%. Next sheet aborbs about 99.96% of that, leaving 99.88% left. After about 10,000 sheets, only about 1.83% of the light is left. Basically all of it has been absorbed (and likely converted into heat).

Consider those sheets to be about 1 meter thick (that is a gross overestimation — it’s probably more like 10 cm thick, but erring on the side of a conservative estimate). That means your 10,000 sheets are a combined 10km thick. The atmosphere is about 10,000km thick. Hence all infared light is abosbed in the first 1/1,000 of the atmosphere.

How much more light is absobed if you increase the opaqueness of those sheets? Answer: none.

Outside of those narrow bands, CO2 is almost completely transparent. So again, if you increased CO2 by even 10 times, the amount of infrared light (again, heat) would NOT CHANGE.

Now the climate “scientists” try to handwave and “computer model” their way around these basic physics facts. After all, computer models are always right (/sarc). But that’s how the REAL physics works.

Short version: manmade aka CO2 caused climate change is not just a hoax, it is not even a very good hoax for those who know the physics. Unfortunately the level of basic physics education in this nation is basically nil with the exception of real engineers, physicists, and scientists.

Furthermore, why does CO2 only make up 0.04% of our atmosphere? The answer is simple: CO2 is PLANT FOOD. More CO2 simply means more plants and thus more O2 (oxygen). The plants including trees, grass, and mostly plankton simply gobble it all up. “Carbon based life forms” anyone in the class?


4 posted on 03/27/2024 2:32:16 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

The climate apocalypse is always ten years away. Clocks and calendars will have to be adjusted constantly to make that always true.

The current approach, to pretend that all the earlier prophecies of doom never happened, has its drawbacks.


5 posted on 03/27/2024 2:32:18 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy (;-,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

I have found this problem evaporates in retirement.


6 posted on 03/27/2024 2:34:29 PM PDT by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

OMG!!!! the whole of human systems will just collapse I tell you. /sarc


7 posted on 03/27/2024 2:35:08 PM PDT by Wuli (ena)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar
The plants including trees, grass, and mostly plankton simply gobble it all up. “Carbon based life forms” anyone in the class?

They don't just gobble it up. Dead plankton, fish poop, and other organic material fall to the ocean floor and become another layer of sediment. Carbon is continually being removed from the atmosphere by biological processes. Those seams of coal we mine were, long ago, vegetation which got buried.

8 posted on 03/27/2024 2:40:33 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Either you will rule. Or you will be ruled. There is no other choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
They don't just gobble it up. Dead plankton, fish poop, and other organic material fall to the ocean floor and become another layer of sediment. Carbon is continually being removed from the atmosphere by biological processes. Those seams of coal we mine were, long ago, vegetation which got buried.

Yup.

Trying to keep this pithy. Could add lots of other facts but then it might become overlong. That said, might incorporate parts of what you said into the next time I post this info. Thanks!

9 posted on 03/27/2024 2:46:07 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: piytar

Hell, all the paper, cardboard, plastic, organic garbage, etc that we bury in landfills counts as “carbon sequestration” too.


10 posted on 03/27/2024 2:49:54 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Either you will rule. Or you will be ruled. There is no other choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

1. Pick anything. Anything at all.

2. Google “Global Warming effect on X”

If X is bad, global warming is magnifying it.
If X is good, global warming is decimating it.


11 posted on 03/27/2024 2:55:27 PM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar

Thanks for presenting what those of us who actually have done real work in this area know about CO2. The climate porn presented daily in our media works only because media types are those who could not and never will pass the most elementary courses in chemistry, physics, and math, let alone any requiring some real analysisl. One other item I usually mention is that CO2 is presently rising from one of the lowest percentages that we know has existed, and had that percentage dropped a bit lower, plants would have gone the way of Biden’s and Rachel Maddow’s IQ.


12 posted on 03/27/2024 3:01:41 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

They postulate 2 factors that might cause the rotation of the earth to slow down, neither of which we can do anything about. Just be glad the rotation of the earth is not speeding up, otherwise we might all get flung into space by centrifugal force.


13 posted on 03/27/2024 3:13:21 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Oh Pleeeeeeeeease


14 posted on 03/27/2024 3:17:23 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Is it me, or all of a sudden have the buried trolls come out on FR like cicadas? It's all noise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Is there anything it can’t cause?


15 posted on 03/27/2024 3:22:28 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

This article is nonsense. If these authors actually have degrees, where did they get them? Cracker Jack prizes?


16 posted on 03/27/2024 3:25:19 PM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

Welcome. I try. May revise a bit based on your and other FReeper’s comments.


17 posted on 03/27/2024 3:28:04 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: piytar

Note: My comment above is copyrighted by operation of law (not up to me — it just happens). I HEREBY GRANT FULL ROYALY FREE WORLDWIDE RIGHTS TO ANYONE AND/OR EVERYONE TO COPY, SHARE, AND/OR OTHERWISE USE ANY, ALL, AND/OR PART OF MY COMMENT as long as my words are not turned against their clear intent to educate.


18 posted on 03/27/2024 3:30:01 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
Sorry, have to add a comment about this:

had that percentage dropped a bit lower, plants would have gone the way of Biden’s and Rachel Maddow’s IQ.

LOL! Da Coyote SHOOTS and SCORES!!!

19 posted on 03/27/2024 3:33:11 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff; All

It’s Official: The Leap Second Will Be Retired (a Decade from Now)

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/19/science/time-leap-second-bipm.html


20 posted on 03/27/2024 3:34:07 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████s████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson