Never read the Warren Commission Report. So drop your ridiculous claim that I follow that.
A moving target? If you look at the downward slope of Elm Street, Oswald had a target that was not moving left or right in his view, but slightly downhill. The limo was not moving fast. At 68 yards in a scope it would not have been that difficult. so that enhances his shot percentages.
Landis, on the approaching 50th anniversary of the Assassination, said: “Oswald. Three shots. That was it. He was a creep who got lucky,” Landis said. “Just some nut who, for some reason, everything went his way that day.” Akron Beacon Journal, Nov 17, 2013. Snopes has nothing about it.
The BBC in 2023 says this: “In an interview with the New York Times, Mr Landis said that after the motorcade arrived at the hospital, he spotted a bullet lodged in the Kennedy’s car behind where the president had been sitting.
He picked it up and pocketed it. Shortly after, in his recollections, he was in an emergency room with President Kennedy, where he said he placed it on the president’s gurney so the evidence would travel with the body.” I do not buy this. Seems like he was trying to sell his book, I would assume this was from the backside of the seat Kennedy was sitting in the limo. No, that bullet would have been buried in the seat, not just sitting there. I do not believe this to be true. And you were there??
“Never read the Warren Commission Report. So drop your ridiculous claim that I follow that.”
There may be ten people alive now who read that nonsense. But its conclusion, that Lee Harvey Oswald acted along, and there were only three shots, hinges on the acceptance of the magic bullet theory. So, yes, you follow the Warren
Commission.
“A moving target? If you look at the downward slope of Elm Street, Oswald had a target that was not moving left or right in his view, but slightly downhill. The limo was not moving fast. At 68 yards in a scope it would not have been that difficult. so that enhances his shot percentages.”
That statement is useless since it strictly conjecture on your part.
“Snopes has nothing about it.”
You might be the only person left who places credence in Snopes.
“I do not buy this. Seems like he was trying to sell his book, I would assume this was from the backside of the seat Kennedy was sitting in the limo. No, that bullet would have been buried in the seat, not just sitting there. I do not believe this to be true.”
Now, that is rich. Are you a forensic expert? And you would assume...
Are we supposed to impressed with what you do not, personally, believe.
“And you were there??”
Extremely illogical question to ask, since you are the one discounting everybody that was actually there, in preference to ideas you pull out of your ass.