“Never read the Warren Commission Report. So drop your ridiculous claim that I follow that.”
There may be ten people alive now who read that nonsense. But its conclusion, that Lee Harvey Oswald acted along, and there were only three shots, hinges on the acceptance of the magic bullet theory. So, yes, you follow the Warren
Commission.
“A moving target? If you look at the downward slope of Elm Street, Oswald had a target that was not moving left or right in his view, but slightly downhill. The limo was not moving fast. At 68 yards in a scope it would not have been that difficult. so that enhances his shot percentages.”
That statement is useless since it strictly conjecture on your part.
“Snopes has nothing about it.”
You might be the only person left who places credence in Snopes.
“I do not buy this. Seems like he was trying to sell his book, I would assume this was from the backside of the seat Kennedy was sitting in the limo. No, that bullet would have been buried in the seat, not just sitting there. I do not believe this to be true.”
Now, that is rich. Are you a forensic expert? And you would assume...
Are we supposed to impressed with what you do not, personally, believe.
“And you were there??”
Extremely illogical question to ask, since you are the one discounting everybody that was actually there, in preference to ideas you pull out of your ass.
The so-called Magic Bullet shot has been proven to be feasible. AS far as the shot, I use my own observations, but I have said I am not an expert on firearms. I use the opinion of what experts have said along with video testimony from experts who say this was not a difficult shot. I have been to the site many times, and viewed the traffic on Elm Street from the ground and by standing next to the sniper’s nest. And some analysis of Zapruder film. No one was firing from the grassy knoll. Forget that claptrap.
As far as the ad hominem attacks, how old are you? 15?