“You can’t talk objectively about Hitler because any agreement or praise of Hitler is simply forbidden.”
Oh wow.
Why would any sane person even write that sentence?
You want to give a malignant evil some praise because the railroads ran on time?
What about Stalin or Pol Pot?
I don't know, probably because the true history of the events that led up to WWII has been covered up or not taught?
You want to give a malignant evil some praise because the railroads ran on time?
What was evil about wanting to preserve your heritage, culture, and country from hyperinflation and decadence?
What about Stalin or Pol Pot?
What about them? They were the true evil people. Communist scum.
A sane person can write that sentence because he’s aware that Hitler was against Kalergi. Kalergi wanted the white European wiped out through mass immigration, just like what is happening in Europe and America today. Kalergi wanted genocide of the native European.
Hitler stood against that. Hitler was evil, no question. However, he understood that not opposing Kalergi would have meant the eventual genocide of the natural born Europeans.
Those who have made a bogey-man out of Hitler, so that you can’t even discuss any aspects of him are using him as a bogey-man to hide their intent to eliminate white people from the earth.
The Nazis did a few, very few, things right.
1. They had spiffy Hugo Boss, designed uniforms
2. They did a good job economic recovery after the 1929 depression.
3. Given the horrible legacy of suffering, murder and tragedy bequeathed to us from Communist governments, they intervened on the correct side of the Spanish Civil War.
Beyond that, there is not much to admire them for.