“because the individual has HIV, regardless of any actual risk of harm”
That sounds like, at the very least, reckless endangerment if the person knew of positive HIV status.
FedGov is either stupid, evil or both.
No wonder nobody wants to fight for them.
Attempted murder.
Or actual murder when the infected dies.
thanks for posting, massmike
The Biden DOJ just sued Tennessee for making it a crime to knowingly transmit AIDS and HIV. They claim it violates disability rights.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4217684/posts
What?
We were fired for not wearing masks or getting shots.
HIV is a contagious disease!
People shall be protected against it!
What about how the Administration treated people with COVID? Or who might have COVID?
The very act of equating civil rights based upon non-moral aspects such as skin color, race, ethnicity, with an immoral proclivity, based upon feelings, is itself perverse confusion.
Since feelings/orientation toward affirming the Bible and having a unique affection for true Christians is a result of being spiritually born again by effectual faith to the risen Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, then they should be protected from having to affirm LGBTQ and being punished for opposing it. After all, they were born again that way.
Conversely, replace the class of persons that these stats refer to with Christians, as a result of one of their consensual acts (baptism, the Lord's supper?) btwn 2 or more persons and tell me what the reaction would be.