Former Trump official says this is another war that would not be happening under The Donald

Twitter/X ^ | Feb 2 | Grenell

[RandFan]

@RichardGrenell

This is yet another war that wouldn’t be happening if Donald Trump were president.

Trump 2024.

[Robert DeLong]

Since I am not an X member, I can only see his post. Is he talking about Israel I’m assuming?

[logi_cal869]

He’s referencing the strikes the xiden handlers ordered in Iraq, Syria & Jordan (which, according to Syrian government statements, began at dawn Syria time, corresponding to the time of the X post).

[Robert DeLong]

Okay, so it is related to Israel. Thanks for sharing.

[bgill]

None of the B bleepin’ S would be happening in the world if Trump was in office.

The more this administration pushes for WWIII, the more it should prove to their kids and grandchildren they don’t love them.

[logi_cal869]

Well, no. It’s not.

But alrighty then. /s

[Robert DeLong]

Well, actually it is.

Sorry you don't see the connection. /sarcasm

[logi_cal869]

Alrighty, then.

Boy: Hamas has a lot more power than they assert. /s

[Robert DeLong]

A rose by any other name is still a rose. So, be it called Hamas, Houthi, Hezbollah, or Iran it's all the same with the same goal & they plan in coordination. It's not just Hamas & Israel fighting, it's the four above who are fighting the little Satan (Israel) & the Great Satan (US), as thy also get assists from Russia & even more from China. The other front is Ukraine, and there is a third but less active front in Africa.

We will be having another WW here in the not too distant future, because they see the US as a wounded animal, and they are not far off in that assessment, because they have been steadily invading the US for years now as out worthless grifter politicians have been selling this nation down the river.

[Robert DeLong]

You may think you are cute, but I never claimed that Hamas was powerful. I said that he was referring to the Israel conflict, because that is what he was referring to. Because everything occurring over there is about the Israel conflict, as well as, creating more fronts for the US to have to respond to.

[logi_cal869]

Exactly.

We should be thankful for Reagan acceding to the Iranian revolutionaries’ demands and ejecting the Jews from ‘Palestine’.

[Robert DeLong]

Reagan didn’t give consent to the Iranian revolutionaries’ to eject Jews from Israel, so what exactly is the point you are trying to make?