"As I have shown in Socrates Forecast Array Nonsense, the turning points in the Forecast Arrays of Martin Armstrong's Socrates have only a success rate of between 20% and 25%."Given that, what Brian Griffin posted in #7 will have a better success rate than Armstrong's predictions."However, he frequently posts cherry-picked success stories on his blog site that suggest otherwise, often saying that Socrates has never been wrong. Here I expose his fraudulent technique of achieving his objective in detail while at the same time exposing a flaw in the system that turned out to be a trap for his helper in the scheme."
I am not a economist or computer expert. If anyone have better understanding of any of this, please post about it.
As discussed in this thread most economic forecasters are wrong most of the time.
That is why I make fun of this whole topic.
At this point Armstrong is getting old and frail—the guy looks like he could croak at any time—so I have trouble getting that upset about him.
The new generation of young fraudsters are a real long term problem.