To: RandFan
Who in Alabama thought that smothering the condemned was a good idea?
4 posted on
01/26/2024 11:25:38 AM PST by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: billorites
"Who in Alabama thought that smothering the condemned was a good idea?" The State's supplier of lethal injection drugs has ceased to be a reliable/useful supplier, so this is the method that was selected as a replacement (other states are facing the same issue over LE drugs). It should be noted that the miscreant executed is the one selecting this option over electrocution.
16 posted on
01/26/2024 11:36:24 AM PST by
alancarp
(George Orwell was an optimist.)
To: billorites
They have to find some way to kill people that doesn't require doctors because the AMA went woke over a decade ago and is now officially against the death penalty.
I still think that a firing squad is the best option, but the optics is too politically incorrect.
To: billorites
c’mo maa don’t lie; the state did not smother him
It has happened many times accidentally in tanks, usually with the worker unaware
35 posted on
01/26/2024 11:50:28 AM PST by
A strike
(Words can have gender, humans cannot.)
To: billorites
Probably Elizabeth Sennett...
40 posted on
01/26/2024 11:56:17 AM PST by
DesertRhino
(2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI)
To: billorites
Who in Alabama thought that smothering the condemned was a good idea? Nobody was holding a pillow over his face. It was not *smothering*.
59 posted on
01/26/2024 1:46:46 PM PST by
metmom
(He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus…)
To: billorites
"Who in Alabama thought that smothering the condemned was a good idea?"

81 posted on
01/26/2024 4:48:50 PM PST by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson