Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote
Ransomnote, the death count by April 2020 was super low, partly because so few around the world had gotten infected, so early.

100% of people in April 2000 also did not die of COVID-19. Why is that?

This doesn't seem useful.

3 posted on 01/22/2024 5:58:23 AM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMind

It seems like most people did not die from Covid in the first place but rather from medical negligence (stay home, do nothing until you can’t breathe or your lips are turning blue) or malpractice of medical protocol of destroying their lungs by venting them and poisoning them with Remdesivir when the vent isn’t working fast enough.


6 posted on 01/22/2024 6:02:49 AM PST by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind

 

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled 99.97% of US sailors infected with covid did not die; this was known in April 2020, ConservativeMind wrote:
Ransomnote, the death count by April 2020 was super low, partly because so few around the world had gotten infected, so early.

100% of people in April 2000 also did not die of COVID-19. Why is that?

This doesn't seem useful.

The Diamond Princess was supposedly identified as having infected COVID patients in a closed system. Close quarters, standing in line or packed in social gatherings without masks andno social distancing. If Covid really was 'Covid' as described, the Diamond Princess was a useful petri dish and should have had high death rate.

Prior to April 6, 2020, the CDC only had a fake test for influenza. Then on April 6, 2020 the CDC began shipping it's fake test for 'Covid' " to select qualified U.S. and international laboratories. Distribution of the tests will help improve the global capacity to detect and respond to the 2019 novel coronavirus."

That new PCR test was not based on (referencing) the virus supposedly responsible for 'Covid,' but was instead based on a 'related corona virus' because the CDC claimed the Covid virus was 'not available.' (note: Fauci et. al. said there were no viruses related to Covid and that's why we needed lockdowns and vaccines)

So starting April 6, a new PCR also not able to identify the Covid virus was implemented. From there it was just a question of defining how 'Covid' deaths were 'diagnosed' or recorded as cause of death (persons dying of cancer were to be recorded as dying of 'Covid'). All smoke and mirrors

https://emergency.cdc.gov/newsletters/coca/020620.htm

Retrospective analysis shows the deathrate was 'normal' for 2020 and conspiculously elevated when the 'vaccines' were released.

Pretending that there was ever anything normal or standard operating procedure for 'Covid' is not helpful.

 


14 posted on 01/22/2024 6:17:29 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson