Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

“I propose that the U.S. Navy will not provide protection to any ship in international waters that doesn’t meet the requirements established under the Jones Act for domestic shipping. Does this sound reasonable to you?”

No, because we would in effect be forcing our domestic law (the Jones Act applies to shipping between US ports, not international shipping) on the rest of the world.


187 posted on 01/11/2024 9:24:09 PM PST by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: ought-six
I don’t see it that way at all. All we would be saying is that the U.S. military would only have responsibility for protecting American ships. Any other nations could have their own standards for their own shipping industries — including those that make port calls in the U.S.

The current scenario is beyond retarded. If you are a maritime shipping company you have every financial and regulatory incentive to domicile your company and flag your vessels in any country but the U.S. — and you can still count on the U.S. taxpayers to pay for the military protection of your ships. It’s astonishing that any American with half a brain would think this makes sense.

190 posted on 01/12/2024 4:03:05 AM PST by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson