Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JayGalt
Other actual scientists are well aware that the relationships you cavalierly dismiss are unclear and mechanisms are unknown.

My PhD was in biochemistry and molecular biology.

Biochemistry is the study of the structure and function of proteins.

Molecular biology is the study of the structure and function of nucleic acids.

This means that I have studied (and researched in the lab) these topics to a level of detail that most people cannot even imagine.

Contrary to your belief, the mechanisms of mRNA activity in the cell are *very* well understood. When I say that there is no mechanism for an mRNA to cause cancer, that's because there is, in fact, no biological mechanism. mRNA lives and dies in the cytoplasm of the cell and never enters the nucleus or the mitochondria. Cancer develops because of aberrations in gene control which happen to the DNA which is located in the nucleus and in the mitochondria. Since mRNA does not interact with DNA, it cannot be carcinogenic.

Likewise, the normal function of the adaptive immune system to analyze antigens and produce antigen-specific T-cells, B-cells, and antibodies is also not a carcinogenic process. Since this particular immune function starts to develop in newborn babies and keeps developing until their late teens, it's unlikely babies would survive very long at all if something about it were carcinogenic.

85 posted on 01/11/2024 1:44:53 PM PST by exDemMom (Dr. exDemMom, infectious disease and vaccines research specialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom

You’re lying by omission.

There are people more qualified than you who have testified under oath about the specific molecular mechanisms by which *these clot shots* cause cancer.

Babbling about mRNA being harmless will not save you.

Dingbat.


112 posted on 01/11/2024 2:50:54 PM PST by grey_whiskers ( The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: exDemMom

You are clearly off base. The explanations you give are not c/w being a biochemist. As a physician with a husband with a PhD in biochemistry I am appalled by your pseudoscience.


118 posted on 01/11/2024 3:15:41 PM PST by JayGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson