Withholding intubation helpful for comatose patients with acute poisoning

Medical Xpress / HealthDay / JAMA / Annual Critical Care Canada Forum ^ | Dec. 8, 2023 | Lori Solomon / Yonathan Freund et al / Zaffer Qasim et al

[ConservativeMind]

A conservative strategy of withholding intubation is associated with clinical benefit in comatose patients with acute poisoning, according to a study.

Yonathan Freund, M.D., Ph.D. and colleagues examined the effect of intubation withholding versus routine practice on clinical outcomes of comatose patients with acute poisoning. The analysis included 225 patients randomly assigned to a conservative airway strategy of intubation withholding (intervention) or routine practice.

The researchers observed a significant clinical benefit for a hierarchical composite end point of in-hospital death, length of intensive care unit stay, and length of hospital stay in the intervention group, with a win ratio of 1.85. There was a lower proportion of any adverse events in the intervention group (6 versus 14.7 percent) compared with the control group. No deaths occurred, and pneumonia occurred in eight patients in the intervention group and 16 receiving regular care.

"A conservative strategy can be used to avoid unnecessary intubation in comatose patients after acute poisoning and could lead to a lower risk of adverse events," the authors write.

[ConservativeMind]

I think this is counterintuitive, but less attention in the ICU helps severe poisoning cases recover safely.

[ConservativeMind]

The “Take Charge Of Your Health” Ping List
This high volume ping list is for health articles and studies which describe something you or your doctor, when informed, may be able to immediately implement for your benefit.

Email me to get on either the “Common/Top Issues” (20 - 25% fewer pings) or “Everything” list.

[JJBookman]

...sounds like just more quackery to me.

[trebb]

I don’t know - with Covid, being intubated was like the kiss of death..