Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2

That’s because weight is the enemy of performance, and higher end vehicles use as light of materials as they can. Occupant safety is mostly a function of the passenger cell on such vehicles, not the fenders or other bodywork. Though that said, they shed a lot of impact energy through that same bodywork disintegrating.

Mind you, they *usually* do better in high speed and other crashes in terms of occupant safety than your average family sedan, despite ‘looking’ worse. That’s not new - go look at Barbra Mandrell’s crash in the 80s, where her Jaguar sedan went head on at highway speed versus a GM pickup that crossed the median. She walked away, the driver of the ‘big strong sturdy truck’ ended up with the engine in his lap and died, despite the Jag being smaller and actually looking like it came off worse in terms of body damage.


124 posted on 12/05/2023 1:24:00 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr
Ah, head-on collisions involving low sport car type vehicles VS taller pickup trucks often result in the lower sport car going underneath the pickup, as seen below.

More than a few of the collisions often resulted in fatalities to the lower sport car vehicles, including the occupants of the lower vehicle being beheaded.

In this scenario, if I have a choice of being in a head-on, I'd opt for being in a higher 3/4 ton truck any day of the week, as opposed to being in a low profile vehicle.

125 posted on 12/05/2023 1:39:26 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson