Posted on 12/04/2023 11:06:15 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion
8:27 is the start of the action on a very interesting 33 minute long youTube episode.
Paul Allen has created a database which, using AI, documents all youtube video of public figures - at all levels of government - such that you can go to https://citizenportal.ai and ask whatever you want to know about the position of whatever politician you are interested in.
The AI transcribes whatever is said at any political meeting which gets to the interned (I forget if it’s only youTube sourced, don’t think so) - and uses the transcription as an index of what is said. Then it can take you to the actual time of the actual source video.
As Glenn Beck said, this is actually a problem because we now will have no excuse for not knowing anything about local office seekers and just voting by party.
Does it include Hunter’s Art Exhibit?
And how does Bill Gates know AI is awesome? Every sane person knows it’s scary AF.
Including Windows Millennium.
AI is coming. (Already here to an extent.) Try to use it for good rather than evil.
Who? me?
Now report all global and domestic donations, bank account, credit, investment, changes with a network graph categorized by conflict of direct or indirect influence, then we have the beginings of a useful ai system to expose corruption.
List conflicts by upcoming and past votes and the Uniparty rats will drown in a sea of truth.
I still have nightmares.
So. Much. Crashing!
But at the time I was working for a company who prized being the first to install the latest greatest thing. I think our tech guy was in competition with someone at one of our rivals. And bragging rights went to who ever got something first.
Putt’s Law:
“Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage, and those who manage what they do not understand.”
Here's two of them.
Not just true, it’s the LAW!
I don’t think Elon Musk fits that mold perfectly.
Hmmm, fair point. Should we change it to Putt’s Rule, or declare that Elon Musk is above the law?
he works hard, he is wealthy(very), and intelligent, has visions of possibilities for the future and he works hard (yes I repeat myself)..
just as the law of lift combines with speed, air velocity and resistance with thrust... to over ride the effects of the laws related to gravity... I would suggest that elon’s actions and frame for addressing the overcoming of the law to which you have referred.
planes overcome the effects of gravity by the hundreds or thousands of miles and millions of people every day... they are in practicum, ABOVE aspects of the law of gravity... look up in the sky... and there they are. satellites are continuously falling at the rate of orbital velocity...
so yes, in a way, elon is above the law, due to the other laws of action he practices day to day.
I don’t LIKE all that he says, believes or implicates... but he due to wealth, action, effort and some vital inspiration... IS above the law.
In that aspect, so is Donald Trump... above the law.
Jordan Peterson described Musk as perhaps one in a thousand in creativity, and one in a thousand in conscientiousness, making his combination of those traits one in a million. And on reflection, upped that to as much as one in a billion.I don’t LIKE all that he says, believes or implicates... but he due to wealth, action, effort and some vital inspiration... IS above the law. In that aspect, so is Donald Trump... above the law.
When Musk bought Twitter and turned it into “X,” it was probably a braver act than he even realized, considering the corruption he was going up against. It is widespread corruption in high places which thinks to be above the law, not Elon Musk or even Donald Trump.According to Scott Adams (who says he was a bank’s loan officer before he was told that because of his not being black or female he was never going to be promoted) describes the charge against Trump that he inflated the value of the collateral he offered for his loan as being presumptively true and utterly irrelevant. In the sense that no bank ever takes a loan applicant’s word for the value of offered loan collateral. Ever. Exaggeration of offered collateral’s value is nominally illegal but absolutely routine. And the bank that Trump “defrauded” testified but only during the sentencing hearing (wonder why they didn’t get the chance during the prosecution phase) that the bank would like more of Trump’s business. Some criminal, some crime!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.