[rlmorel]

Perhaps this is where the “20% of vaccinated New Zealanders died” came from the other day.

People rightly poked holes in that with “Yeah. The population of New Zealand is five million people, so 20% would be a million deaths. I don’t think so.”

But here is a limited population of vaccinations from one batch of vaccine, and it says 21% there, which is possible.

[goodnesswins]

Hhhmmmmm...THAT is interesting, if true

[Political Junkie Too]

One way to tell will be to compare the turnout in New Zealand's next election with the turnout from prior elections. Did the turnout go down by 20%?

I bet they can't hide that number in a small country with 5.2 million people with tight immigration controls.

-PJ

[zipper]

Perhaps this is where the “20% of vaccinated New Zealanders died” came from the other day.

Except it wasn’t “Winston Smith’s” fault that the publisher Slay News misquoted him. He was saying some clusters, categorized by vaccinator or by administrative location, had extremely high death rates, as high as 30 percent. These numbers can’t be explained by coincidence, and occur across age groups.

Of course many drive-by posters on FR jumped on the headline without comprehending what the whistleblower, Mr. Smith, was actually saying, because they are intellectually lazy, and, in many cases, ideologically aligned with tyranny, or unwilling to confess their misplaced loyalty to the failed and dangerous jabs.

[Pocketdoor]

Not many bothered to read the article on that “20%” headline quote. I’m glad to this article have a little more detail.