And here's another example of our anti-Ukers claiming to know negative things about Davydov which cannot be verified and so must be classified as nothing more than mud-slinging.
As for alleged "propaganda", depending on your definitions, almost anything can be called "propaganda" but in a political sense "propaganda" doesn't just mean opinions or selected facts, but implies outright intentions to dishonestly distort & misrepresent facts to fit a preestablished narrative.
I've seen nothing from Davydov to justify such claims.