Dr. Malone did early, groundbreaking work on mRNA. And for that he should be admired. But when Covid broke out, he started making all sorts of wild claims without citing any evidence.
Who knows? Maybe he’s right about every last thing. But as a scientist, he should know scientific claims require evidence.
Oddly enough, Dr. Malone and I are on the same side here (anti-vax). I think he just got carried away. He went from being a respected skeptic to being a bit of a kook. Overall, he hurt the cause.
As for Dr. Tenpenny, I’ve followed her as well. She makes a living selling anti-vax books and giving anti-vax seminars at $600 a ticket. That’s all she does. She’s just as believable as a Pfizer spokesperson would be. Follow the money, as the old saying goes.
Just my opinion. Others might reach different conclusions, and I respect that.
I’ll Freepmail you later.
Would you bother posting to me, a specific claim made by Dr. Malone *himself* which is necessarily “kooky” (as opposed to just inconvenient for Pfauci, Pfizer, Moderna, et al)?
Having other people presenting with him, or guest slots on his site, who are kooks, does not transfer, unless and until, he explicitly endorses their claims, without evidence.
And even if he does that, it does not mean that all of his claims are suspect.
There is such a thing as mutual economic interests, in a time when the powers that be are destroying careers and livelihoods for questioning the narrative.
FReegards!
@grey_whiskers
You mean like Pfizer making $120 billion off the clot shots?
Or Moderna going from being $1.7 billion in debt to making oodles of its own money : including making five new billionaires...