Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Each one of those lines is a hypertext link to a list of hypretext link to scientific articles: for example, the first one contains links to 228 articles,

to places like sciencedirect.org (Elsevier), PubMed, JAMAnetwork.com, nejm.org, and so forth.

1 posted on 11/19/2023 10:45:52 AM PST by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers; ransomnote; bitt; Jane Long; Melian; fireman15; george76; SeekAndFind; ...
Link to the menu at the address here.
2 posted on 11/19/2023 10:47:28 AM PST by grey_whiskers ( The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

I got everything, man.
I got everything, man.
Nothing I can do, man.
I can’t even sue, man.


3 posted on 11/19/2023 10:51:19 AM PST by HombreSecreto (The life of a repo man is always intense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

But wait! It’s safe and effective. /s


4 posted on 11/19/2023 11:10:26 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

The first one I selected:

Item 1, Paper #2


Conclusions
We report a case series of probable hypersensitivity myocarditis with consistent temporal association to receipt of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. While the true incidence of this adverse event is unknown at this time, the presentation pattern and clinical course suggest an association with an inflammatory response to vaccination. Increased attention to myocarditis as a potential adverse event following immunization is warranted. Recognition of the substantial morbidity associated with COVID-19 infection, including risk of cardiac injury, and the strong effectiveness of immunization in preventing infection provide important context for this topic. Concerns about rare adverse events following immunization should not diminish overall confidence in the value of vaccination.


6 posted on 11/19/2023 11:25:42 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

Paper #4 (going down the list):

“The benefits of vaccination significantly exceed possible risks.”


30 posted on 11/19/2023 1:17:14 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

One purpose of linking to a massive number of papers claiming that they all “prove” something is to overwhelm anyone trying to get at the truth.

Professional antivax propagandists know that the audience they target is unlikely to ever look at the original published papers. And even if they did look, they have no clue what those papers are actually saying.

A debunker of antivax claims really only needs to show that the professional antivax propagandist lied about one paper. Because if they lied about one paper, chances are very high they lied about all of the papers.

Of course, no matter how many papers the supporter of science shows that the the professional antivaxxer lied about, the professional antivaxxer will just claim that all scientists are liars and, therefore, their papers say whatever the propagandist claims they say. And the propagandist will never explain how he/she has so much “insider” knowledge that the entire scientific and medical community—the people who actually do the scientific research—somehow missed.


32 posted on 11/19/2023 1:19:11 PM PST by exDemMom (Dr. exDemMom, infectious disease and vaccines research specialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

bttt


91 posted on 11/19/2023 8:32:31 PM PST by Pajamajan (Pray for our nation. Never be slave e in a new Socialist America ?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson