Posted on 11/19/2023 7:07:51 AM PST by rod5591
A former South Carolina teacher was arrested Wednesday for preying on a 17-year-old high school football player, according to a local news station.
Married mother-of-two Reagan Anderson, 27, is facing two counts of sexual battery on a Holly Hill Academy student for the alleged abuse, WCSC reported.
The alleged victim's mother blasted Anderson at a bond hearing on Thursday.
"A trusted coach, teacher and friend that abused our trust and violated her oath as an educator. She has ruined our son's life," the teen's mother read from a statement in court.
"He should be 100% focused on being a fun-loving football-playing young man, but this predator has robbed him of that ability. No young quarterback or athlete is safe in our community if this woman is free," the outraged mother continued.
The judge set Anderson's bond at $2,500 and told her not to have any contact with the victim or his family. She was released with a GPS monitor the same day.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
There’s only one God, whether you believe it or not. You can’t make up your own belief system. It’s either God’s way or hell.
The lack of moral vision by so many here is worrisome. The teacher was in the wrong. Both ethically and morally. As I have stated in other posts I am not that concerned with the age difference. Had a relationship between two single people where one was not constrained by ethics about who they could be with I would look askance at somebody demanding a 17 year old be protected from being with a 27 year old.
What concerns me is that she was his teacher. That and how many are willing to give women who take advantage of adolescent boys high fives provided she is attractive.
As they should be. Men and women are different.
So I guess then that all these guys who are applauding this kid getting it on with the female teacher, would have no problem if it were a homosexual situation, a male teacher with a male student.
After all, since according to those applauding this, sex is sex and it doesn’t affect guys much anyways. What difference does it make who he does it with?
Right?
“trans”? “cutting off dicks”?
You must be female. Because if you’re male you’re certifiable.
Only a woman could could be so clueless about normal male nature to associate trans and cutting off dicks with a 17 yr old getting sexually involved with a 25 yr old woman.
Every time that I think I’ve run across maximum stupidity someone comes along to prove me wrong.
Who gave the woman high fives for what she did? I didn't see that at all in one hundred and something plus posts.
After all, since according to those applauding this, sex is sex and it doesn’t affect guys much anyways. What difference does it make who he does it with?
Right?
Are you daft or totally insane? How could you make that kludged up inference?
Innocent.
No, because that is different, Only an idiot can’t see the difference.
Not the Bee.
I think you get it.
It does follow that if the adolescent involved should be given “You lucky dog” treatment if the woman involved is attractive then she too is worthy of cheering on for her part in reaching that accolade.
What do you think the so many “Not guilty!” posts mean? Surely not a somber judgemental tone.
“As they should be. Men and women are different.”
The Church Lady batallion has ditched that idea.
They now combine 1970 Feminism’s “There’s no difference between men and women” with good old fashioned Puritan scolding. Our job is to sit back and enjoy the show.
Well, it’s good to know you have no problems with teachers having sex with students.
Just for laughs check out a Gal named Pearl, on YouTube, that challenges todays girls and reveals just how rigged the game is against boys. Makes one wonder who would want such girls for anything other than casual association? Girls today seem to think having multiple sex partners and a few kids makes them more desirable. Oh well, as Happy Goodman would say this place is not my home, I am just a passing through.
17 YO young men go to war, they can also enjoy an older woman. It’s on her and not him.
Yes, it is primarily on the teacher. But some on this thread appear to have no problem with teachers having sex with students. And even condemning the students mother for bringing this to light and demanding accountability. Even going so far as to suggest her parental rights be terminated and the son turned over to foster care.
How about standing against sex between any student and teacher? I don’t think that is what our taxes should be used to foster.
17 year olds aren’t children. They can join the military. Spare me the phariseeisms.
The Pharisees are always with us. They just call them feminists now
Well, it’s the freaking liberals who cheapened sex to this point, not the Freepers. A few jokes never hurt anyone
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.