Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Owen

The Epoch Times article *is* filled with a lot of innuendo, suggesting that the CDC hid data or something. Epoch Times is good at that kind of “reporting.”

Innuendo is not the same as presenting solid facts.

Of course, the Epoch Times authors do not expect or want anyone to actually go back and read the article.

The study was a collaboration between CDC researchers and university, hospital, and other researchers.

Another study published in MMWR showed that among people who had previously had Covid, those who did not subsequently get vaccinated were 2.34 times more likely to get reinfected with Covid than those who got vaccinated. This shows that, even for people who have had Covid, it is beneficial to get vaccinated.

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7032e1.htm#contribAff


12 posted on 11/17/2023 7:31:07 PM PST by exDemMom (Dr. exDemMom, infectious disease and vaccines research specialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom

Sod Off Swampy.


19 posted on 11/17/2023 8:01:48 PM PST by grey_whiskers ( The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: exDemMom; bitt; ransomnote; Jane Long; fireman15; george76; SeekAndFind

We already know the PCR test was never meant to be used as a diagnostic, despite your blathering. We also know the number of amplification cycles were vastly extended: even if you were to ignore the fact it wasn't meant for diagnosis, the extension of cycles greatly increased the number of false positives.

We also know people were bribed to lie and attribute deaths to COVID-2984 instead of the clot shots.

We also know the "official" numbers pretended people were unjabbed for up to two weeks after the clot shots, further skewing the numbers.

We know Pfizer hid/lied about biodistribution of clot shot contents inside the body.

Also we know from an FOIA request, Pfizer cooked the books on the number of deaths in their experimental arm.

So waving around a "study" and jumping up and down like Yahoo shouting "SCIENCEā„¢!" doesn't demonstrate anything.

Except that you are a $hot $hill and troll.

Oh wait. I forgot CALCULUS. That trumps everything!

26 posted on 11/18/2023 8:31:14 AM PST by grey_whiskers ( The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: exDemMom

Hey Dingbat.

MOAR disciplined, sound, rigorous scientific practice.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4197738/posts?page=1

Revolving door regulators.

And published in, like, a peer-reviewed journal and everything.

Let’s see what kind of sputtering ad hominem you come up with now.

Because ad hominem is sound SCIENCEā„¢! — when you or your fellow trolls do it.


27 posted on 11/18/2023 8:36:50 AM PST by grey_whiskers ( The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson