Posted on 11/17/2023 5:45:58 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski
A top executive from the company behind the voting machines that “flipped votes” in Pennsylvania on Tuesday has admitted that “someone from our team programmed the election.”
The voting machine issued caused votes in an eastern Pennsylvania county to appear to be “flipped” on a ballot question, officials said Tuesday.
Voters were asked to decide whether Pennsylvania Superior Court Judges Jack Panella and Victor Stabile should be retained for additional 10-year terms.
The “yes” or “no” votes for each judge were switched on a summary displayed to voters before they cast their ballot, said Charles Dertinger, the Northampton County director of administration.
If a voter marked “yes” to retain Panella and “no” on Stabile, for example, it was reflected as “no” on Panella and “yes” on Stabile.
Voters noticed the error on the printed voting records produced by the touchscreen machines.
The issue was brought to the attention of poll workers shortly after the start of voting on Tuesday morning.
During a news conference in Easton on Tuesday afternoon, Dertinger insisted that votes would be tabulated accurately.
“What you read and what the computer reads are two different things,” he said…
(Excerpt) Read more at slaynews.com ...
Precisely.
Little known fact: There were about 3-1/2 decades during which the Republican Party couldn’t contest election fraud due to a consent decree. Amazing, but it is true. This only ended in 2018.
During that time I believe the Dems brought voter fraud to a high level of effectiveness, and contesting dirty elections atrophied among Republicans.
It will take a long time to fix the problems this created.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/09/rnc-ballot-security-consent-decree-328995
BTTT
See my tagline.
There is just no way, no way at all any programmable device should be used to count votes. I recall when computerized gadgets were first introduced for vote counting. It was so obvious it would be a fraudsters pipe dream. And with the vast majority of the voting sheep believing a computer is infallible will also believe tampering is impossible. After all “computers do not make mistakes”.
People will be getting exactly what they vote for until they stand up and insist on paper ballots and hand counting only.
I wish that was true but l don’t think so
When do these folks go to prison?
Hah...I made a funny.
“What you read and what the computer reads are two different things,” he said…
That’s really ALL we need to know about computer voting systems right there.
Barely a smidgen of corruption . . . /sig
P
Any computer programmer can understand the concept of a toggle switch, or turning a zero to a one, in fact any engineer, any handyman, anyone who has turned a light switch on and off. Once you understand that computers only do what the programmer asked it to do, you can understand that programmers of computers changed a Presidential landslide into a defeat....thanks to the Machiavellian tactics by the Dem braintrust of fixing only those districts that swing an election. In my little neck of the woods, the Dems used the old fashioned method of filling out harvested unused ballots by hand. Only needed a couple thousand to end Republic domination after decades.
Waiting to see if this story has legs...
Where are all the Freepers who say the machines can’t flip votes? 😉
Go back to paper ballots, have only one day voting, and have the precincts guarded by the military to ensure integrity. No more mail in ballots except to military overseas, period.
I read the article twice. I find it odd that the name of “the voting machine company” is not mentioned. Hmmm.
That suggestion is rayciss.
The man with the pencil always wins!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.