Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voting Machine Company That ‘Flipped’ Votes in Pennsylvania Admits ‘Someone Programmed the Election’
Slay News ^ | 11/08/2023 | Frank Bergman

Posted on 11/17/2023 5:45:58 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski

A top executive from the company behind the voting machines that “flipped votes” in Pennsylvania on Tuesday has admitted that “someone from our team programmed the election.”

The voting machine issued caused votes in an eastern Pennsylvania county to appear to be “flipped” on a ballot question, officials said Tuesday.

Voters were asked to decide whether Pennsylvania Superior Court Judges Jack Panella and Victor Stabile should be retained for additional 10-year terms.

The “yes” or “no” votes for each judge were switched on a summary displayed to voters before they cast their ballot, said Charles Dertinger, the Northampton County director of administration.

If a voter marked “yes” to retain Panella and “no” on Stabile, for example, it was reflected as “no” on Panella and “yes” on Stabile.

Voters noticed the error on the printed voting records produced by the touchscreen machines.

The issue was brought to the attention of poll workers shortly after the start of voting on Tuesday morning.

During a news conference in Easton on Tuesday afternoon, Dertinger insisted that votes would be tabulated accurately.

“What you read and what the computer reads are two different things,” he said…

(Excerpt) Read more at slaynews.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: election; electionfraud; machines; pennsylvania; vote; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
“It’s not he who votes that counts, but he who counts the votes” - Uncle Joe Stalin
1 posted on 11/17/2023 5:45:58 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

From 2006...

https://www.computerworld.com/article/2548127/update—is—vote-flipping—an-e-voting-problem-or-user-error-.html

There’s a very good reason why Deep State loves electronic voting machines and is getting hand counting of ballots banned...


2 posted on 11/17/2023 5:48:06 AM PST by mewzilla (Never give up; surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski
Errors like this are easily caught with a hand recount of the ballots.

This is not a smoking gun of how 202 was stolen.

3 posted on 11/17/2023 5:49:29 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I don’t believe those results even if the Democrat judge won.


4 posted on 11/17/2023 5:50:37 AM PST by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

“The voting machine issued caused votes in an eastern Pennsylvania county to appear to be “flipped” on a ballot question, officials said Tuesday.”

This is probably an example as to how that abortion amendment to the Ohio constitution got approved.


5 posted on 11/17/2023 5:50:44 AM PST by lowbridge ("Let’s check with Senator Schumer before we run it" - NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

If you watch the video she admits that...

“Someone on our team, made an error”

Uh huh, and we will never know who did it and they will never be held accountable.


6 posted on 11/17/2023 5:52:09 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
This is not a smoking gun of how 202 was stolen.

Yes…but it does show yet another vector in stealing elections.
7 posted on 11/17/2023 5:53:34 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski; All
Dear IRS, regarding my tax return confusion, “What you read and what the computer reads are two different things.”

That will solve the question…….. 😳

8 posted on 11/17/2023 5:55:32 AM PST by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

And high tech is the only way to steal a landslide.


9 posted on 11/17/2023 5:55:43 AM PST by mewzilla (Never give up; surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Voter fraud undermines our Constitution like no other crime. It should receive an automatic death penalty.


10 posted on 11/17/2023 5:56:11 AM PST by jimbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski
Yes…but it does show yet another vector in stealing elections.

It is a vector in jurisdictions that vote by touch panel with no paper ballot.

Those that use scanned paper ballots always have the paper for a manual recount, which is why I am so against touch panel voting.

And for some reason my second zero didn't show up in 2020...

11 posted on 11/17/2023 5:56:52 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I voted against Emperor Severus myself.


12 posted on 11/17/2023 5:57:15 AM PST by lowbridge ("Let’s check with Senator Schumer before we run it" - NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Sorry, no.

If the screen says yes when the voter votes no and no when the voter vites yes, it is impossible to identify what choice the voter actually made. What if they chose no to vote yes?


13 posted on 11/17/2023 5:57:41 AM PST by MattMusson (Sometimes the wind bweek.lows too much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla; bitt; little jeremiah

but, but, but..... no evidence of WIDE SPREAD voter fraud


14 posted on 11/17/2023 5:58:55 AM PST by thinden (buckle up ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Beat me to it


15 posted on 11/17/2023 5:59:50 AM PST by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

I understand that France went back to 100% hand counting and they finish counting votes on election days. Maybe we should take a lesson from them.


16 posted on 11/17/2023 6:00:19 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

No to computer voting machines. Go back to mechanical lever machines; no programs, no hacking.


17 posted on 11/17/2023 6:00:21 AM PST by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

“Errors like this are easily caught with a hand recount of the ballots.”

It depends on the what the machine is doing

1) Scanning paper ballots, the it is easy to catch
2) Recording selections made by voter on a terminal, not so easy to catch


18 posted on 11/17/2023 6:01:24 AM PST by JSM_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
“Someone on our team, made an error got caught.”

------------------------------

Fixed!
19 posted on 11/17/2023 6:06:40 AM PST by HombreSecreto (The life of a repo man is always intense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MattMusson
Sorry, no.

If the screen says yes when the voter votes no and no when the voter vites yes, it is impossible to identify what choice the voter actually made. What if they chose no to vote yes?

Sorry, yes. I said that it doesn't work for touch screen voting, and that I was against touch screen voting for that very reason.

20 posted on 11/17/2023 6:16:55 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson