Reposting my position, this is specifically about Trump’s return. I have another “working theory” more about the Q Plan, will post in a bit. I remain positive and upbeat. There is no other option but for the Q plan to work. The other option is a military coup, which the Q plan was created to avoid. This is a war between Good and Evil, and Good has to win.
Trump has been giving out TWO distinct messages:
1. Running in 2024
2. That he’ll be back sooner than we think, in less than 5 months (a couple of months ago??), dropping many hints, statements, etc in speeches, conversations, and the like, including the TikTok lady (i have that saved if anyone wants to re-visit).
Now, both of these cannot be true, only one. Therefore, one is meant for us, and one for the enemy. To me, he’s telling us he’ll be back sooner. For the enemy and normies, and for other reasons, that he’s running in 2024. This presumed run gives him many advantages - he can get campaign donations, he’s giving nonstop almost daily speeches and rallies which are likely being watched by many more people on account if his 2024 run.
Additionally, because he’s officially a candidate, he’s in the news a lot more, giving interviews and the like. If he was not running, he wouldn’t be getting anywhere near the publicity and the opportunity to get his message out to more and more people.
He has quoted Sun Tzu’s dictum about letting your plans be secret, and then strike like “the fastest animal on the planet”.
Add to this, the theft mechanisms are almost all, if not completely all, still in place, with mail in voting, state Secretaries of State and other state officials connected with voting procedures, many funded by Soros, are still in their positions. What will stop 2024 from being stolen?
Answer: nothing. The idea that if even MORE people vote for Trump the fraud can be overwhelmed is just plain silly. It is estimated he got 80 million votes in 2020.
Why does he seem very cheerful and upbeat?
Now, both of these cannot be true, only one. Therefore, one is meant for us, and one for the enemy.
Great analysis. (But I admit I am contemplating ways that both can be true!)