The way things are going, we can expect a rinse and repeat process.
Posted on 11/08/2023 9:15:39 AM PST by CharlesOConnell
Simply searching for "all wars are bankers' wars" (a video by Zane Henry Productions, spoken by Michael Rivero), the honest search results are at the top--there's no deflection by "fact checkers", the very numerous platforms hosting the film are all at the top, for pages and pages--it's even on YouTube. The question is, doesn't "permission to pass" by the Social Media leviathan mean that, whatever content of the search is pushed to the top, is something favored by the Oligarchs (the approximately 2,750 billionaires)?
(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...
Really? Of course they won’t censor that. Retitle it “All wars are Muslim wars” and see how long it stays posted.
Yes, all wars are bankers wars, and have been, all our lives.
Wars today cannot be waged without the enthusiastic support of the bankers.
It also seems that they share a belief that they should tell you of their murderous efforts, somewhat discreetly, yet proudly.
very similar to what happened in Ukraine and why Russia was cut off from the internet . Russia kept saying they were robbed by the EU through the Uke proxy and the money owed by the EU banks just kept shrinking and then turned into "sanctions" when Russia pulled the plug on zelensky, but GOOGLE presents a different evolved and edited version of history with none of that "russian propaganda " to influence thinking
The civil war was a “bankers war” and WWII also???
Interesting how that works, isn’t it?
If you get the sense now and then that the world is being run by cackling demons, welcome to the “party”, friend.
~Easy
While those wars required certain banker involvement as well, I wasn’t around for those, and our bankers Today have evolved into something else entirely, it would seem.
Why should it be censored? I had never heard of it until now, thank you for bringing it to our attention.
What may “seem” to be, is not a statment of empirical facts.
Claiming that bakers want and promote wars, that would not occur otherwise, is like saying arms manufacturers are behind every U.S. national military engagement that uses U.S. produced arms, as if those engagements have no other more pressing reason for them in the eyes of the elected officials.
That someone benefits from something does not make that beneficiary the cause of that from which they benefited.
Wars can require borrowing and lending and they require arms. That’s just a fact of wars, not a statement of their causes.
The way things are going, we can expect a rinse and repeat process.
Maybe because the premise is ridiculous?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.