While those wars required certain banker involvement as well, I wasn’t around for those, and our bankers Today have evolved into something else entirely, it would seem.
What may “seem” to be, is not a statment of empirical facts.
Claiming that bakers want and promote wars, that would not occur otherwise, is like saying arms manufacturers are behind every U.S. national military engagement that uses U.S. produced arms, as if those engagements have no other more pressing reason for them in the eyes of the elected officials.
That someone benefits from something does not make that beneficiary the cause of that from which they benefited.
Wars can require borrowing and lending and they require arms. That’s just a fact of wars, not a statement of their causes.