Ukrainian to US prosecutors: Why don’t you want our evidence on Democrats?

thehill.com ^ | 04/07/2019 | John Solomon

[ransomnote]

SNIP

• Sworn statements from two Ukrainian officials admitting that their agency tried to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election in favor of Hillary Clinton. The effort included leaking an alleged ledger showing payments to then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort;
• Contacts between Democratic figures in Washington and Ukrainian officials that involved passing along dirt on Donald Trump;
• Financial records showing a Ukrainian natural gas company routed more than $3 million to American accounts tied to Hunter Biden, younger son of then-Vice President Joe Biden, who managed U.S.-Ukraine relations for the Obama administration. Biden’s son served on the board of a Ukrainian natural gas company, Burisma Holdings;
• Records that Vice President Biden pressured Ukrainian officials in March 2016 to fire the prosecutor who oversaw an investigation of Burisma Holdings and who planned to interview Hunter Biden about the financial transfers;
• Correspondence showing members of the State Department and U.S. Embassy in Kiev interfered or applied pressure in criminal cases on Ukrainian soil;
• Disbursements of as much as $7 billion in Ukrainian funds that prosecutors believe may have been misappropriated or taken out of the country, including to the United States.

Ukrainian officials say they don’t want to hand the evidence to FBI agents working in Ukraine because they believe the bureau has a close relationship with the NABU and the U.S. Embassy. “It is no secret in Ukrainian political circles that the NABU was created with American help and tried to exert influence during the U.S. presidential election,” Kulyk told me. Kulyk’s boss, Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko, told me he has enough evidence — particularly involving Biden, his family and money spirited out of Ukraine — to warrant a meeting with U.S. Attorney General William Barr.

[ransomnote]

Our government was so entirely corrupt when Trump took office I'm amazed he was able to achieve what he did, with criminals fighting him every step of the way. Note the article is from 2019 and the administration DID use the information John Solomon documented, but they used it to try to remove Trump from office, ignoring all other crimes. Here's the editor's note which appears before the article at the link:

Editor’s note: John Solomon’s columns regarding Ukraine became a subject of the House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment inquiry against President Trump. Any updated information can be found at the end of the column.

[JonPreston]

Rudy had all this all bundled up tightly and Barr blew him off.

[thinden]

thanx for dusting this soloman piece off for us

[laconic]

All Trump has to do in the upcoming election is to resurrect Ronald Reagan’s query used against another hopeless incompetent elected President and there is no evidence that Carter, other than being a phony, was a crook or senile. “Are you better off than you were four years ago?” With the exception of the corrupt military industrial complex and those forgiven their student loans, I would imagine the vast majority would say “NO”.

[EasySt]

The desperate state must remain in power or face justice for its many treasons.

We allowed our media and our educational institutions to be monopolized by commies, fascists, degenerates and crooks.

The REAL Election Fraud starts with a controlled narrative.
Any faked results are just to support the controlled narrative.

The REAL fraud was managed by what was reported, and what was covered up.

As the truth of their evil becomes widely obvious, expect their worst instincts and desperation to drive their coming actions.

[Michael.SF.]

That’s it? That is all they have? Obviously there is zero evidence that Joe himself benefited all that.

do I really need a sarcasm tag?

[PGR88]

Ukraine is at the center of every major DC scandal over the last 10 years. From the dossier, to DNC server, to spying on Trump, to Hunter and Joe’s corruption to Trump’s fake impeachment.

The sooner Russia takes it, the better off average Americans will be

[eyeamok]

What a Stupid Question. They got PAID, what are they supposed to do, give the money back?

[kelly4c]

It’s a shame that it really doesn’t matter what kind of evidence comes out or how much. The Bidens appear to be untouchable.

[Toespi]

Is this a shot over Biden’s bow?

[ransomnote]

No. The article was written by John Solomon in 2019. It implicated Biden et. al. in crimes. Congress cherry picked whatever it could from the report and used it ONLY against Trump, to try to remove him from office.

[bitt]

p

[GOPJ]

Contacts between Democratic figures in Washington and Ukrainian officials that involved passing along dirt on Donald Trump;

Financial records showing a Ukrainian natural gas company routed more than $3 million to American accounts tied to Hunter Biden, younger son of then-Vice President Joe Biden, who managed U.S.-Ukraine relations for the Obama administration. Biden’s son served on the board of a Ukrainian natural gas company, Burisma Holdings;

Records that Vice President Biden pressured Ukrainian officials in March 2016 to fire the prosecutor who oversaw an investigation of Burisma Holdings and who planned to interview Hunter Biden about the financial transfers;

Correspondence showing members of the State Department and U.S. Embassy in Kiev interfered or applied pressure in criminal cases on Ukrainian soil;

Disbursements of as much as $7 billion in Ukrainian funds that prosecutors believe may have been misappropriated or taken out of the country, including to the United States.

Ukrainian officials say they don’t want to hand the evidence to FBI agents working in Ukraine because they believe the bureau has a close relationship with the NABU and the U.S. Embassy. “It is no secret in Ukrainian political circles that the NABU was created with American help and tried to exert influence during the U.S. presidential election,” Kulyk told me. Kulyk’s boss, Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko, told me he has enough evidence — particularly involving Biden, his family and money spirited out of Ukraine — to warrant a meeting with U.S. Attorney General William Barr.

This is old - Barr hasn't been Attorney General in years - but it is interesting in the sense they knew the FBI was corrupt even back then...