They should use leather helmets again.
Posted on 11/03/2023 3:03:24 PM PDT by george76
https://x.com/_mlfootball/status/1718740793970598366?s=42&t=NexZL3q5zPVlsId4o7YuHg
So this^ is legit to you?
Ok - upon further review, moving the ball back was correct. (You’re right!)
However, the way they shielded the ball movement was very suspicious. They should not have danced around it like that.
Now, go get your bivalent booster…
Ahhh the Pavlovian response complete with ad hominem attack. Perhaps you should learn a debate style that would be that of an 8 year old instead of a 4 year old
That being said the data are equivocal but you always seem to interpret in the worst possible light which is often also conveniently incorrect. Having a strong academic interest and background in molecular biology, your insult is quite funny as in pathetic. While I believe we have exchanged info in the past as to backgrounds, I know you are relatively educated in some of these areas.
And as I haven’t recommended vaccination against corona virus and rarely test for it except under very unusually clinical circumstances, you seem to not to research things you spout off. A shame. Unlike some of your brethren you could actually discern what is going on.
The optics on it were awful as to the replay assist. When that has happened in some of the games I call where we have replay assist (quick replay) I have the crew make damn sure of being situationally aware so it doesn’t look sketchy. The way it was caught on tape looked awful.
The inside baseball (or football as the case may be) is that a lot of replay assist occurs especially on long passes down field. I have an interest in tech on officiating as it could be done so much better than it is now. There is the debate, especially in football, about the replay official becoming the “sky judge” and allowing him to create fouls. Right now it’s only for things that have to do with lines and times. The missed DPI in New Orleans playoff game a couple years ago was the lightning rod for the debate.
The danger is over officiating judgment calls as the gut feeling ok whether to pass on a hold or throw it is often the beat analysis. So I am generally not in favor of it. From a fans perspective especially at the higher level, the white hat has to worry shout getting all the commercial packages in, moving the game along, getting it in in under three hours and making it flow. There is real artistry in that. We spend a lot of time thinking on which players are getting edgy and keeping the game from boiling over.
There is so much work in the background that when done well it is invisible to the average fan. And even when it is going well, there is always that potential that it cousin go sideways in a flash. So you get through all of that and take a deep breath, and turn on the mic and smile at the camera and wonder if your fly is unzipped.
Anyway what remains true is that you can get it all correct and then shoot your self with the optics. One thing that has always stuck with me — no group of humans have ever blown their own wanker off than sports officials. And republican members of congress.
Mueder of Crows
Riot of Blacks
Gaggle of geese
You seem to know your football- stick to that.
Too many teams scoring needlessly late to beat the spread. It as obvious as Democrat voter fraud.
Good for you. I seriously detest football and therefore never watch.
However, when they broadcast Rugby, I do watch. I don’t think there are any rules, no helmets or pads anywhere. Always good for a laugh and I don’t care who wins.
I don't like curling particularly, but the wife hates it.
LOL, glad your wife hates it.
I only stick to what I know. I also know medicine and having tried all the therapies often fighting with HCA (yes I will name the publicly traded company who forbade me from giving ivermectin thereby demonstrating their interference with my lane singing the fauci line) so I ordered it from our patients pharmacies and had families get it and then allowed them to bring it in as early on that was a viable theory and what could it hurt (right to try) and also fought paying the lawyer sitting next to me at disciplinary inquiries i which i prevailed, and when I saw it fail repeatedly, I pivoted to as the time line went to monoclonal even as a prophylaxis for those making political decisions to get them safety, I know medicine. The data has since shown in the neighborhood of what I saw regarding vaccination against delta. It probably saved my life.
I also know it is no longer necessary. All the while being told here I was a killer and me feel and getting doxxed by the particularly violent members. Turns out I hit just near the bullseye.
This is why I can’t stand fauci, was glad to vaccinated and as the virus has evolved to a nothing burger why I don’t test my patients or recommend vaccination except in the most rare of circumstance.
Anyway. Have a great night. Good seeing you pop up on a thread.
Refs tried to gift Dallas a victory.
But then the Cowboys did Cowboys things at the end.
Mel Farr, 1967
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled This is why a lot of us have stopped watching football, gas_dr wrote: EXCERPT OF GAS_DR's post: And as I haven’t recommended vaccination against corona virus and rarely test for it except under very unusually clinical circumstances, you seem to not to research things you spout off.
gas_dr has asked me not to post to him.
It's bad enough gas_dr claims to be a real doctor, but what gas and other fake doctors on FR did was worse than 'recommend vaccination against corona virus'. They used psyop techniques. For example, gas insisted that he was a treating physician, and none of his ICU 'patients' was vaccinated, or none of the patients in 'his' ICU who died was vaccinated.
The other fake doctor would post things like, "Do you want to take your chances or do you want to get vaccinated." Get that? As if taking the experimental gene therapy was not taking any sort of a risk. Our fake doctors pretend the successful treatment protocols frequently posted on FR (Zelenko, McCullough, FLCC etc.) don't exist. It was psychological manipulation by fake shills pretending to be doctors, using that 'doctor' claim to boost lies to make them seem credible. So people falsely belive gas is a doctor, while he claims he's glad he got the vax. This allows the FRoctors (Fake FR doctors) to claim they never recommended the vax.
FReeper Terart should not have trusted gas_dr, but he kept saying he was a doctor, and warned her not to take more ivermectin, but to seek monoclonals instead. From my prior post re gas_dr:
FReeper Terart posted a thread asking for FReeper help. She was denied all treatment from her doctors and had not taken enough Ivermectin (2 days only). While pretending to be a doctor, (gas) failed to factor in her blood ox after so many days of illness, so he sent her off to seek monoclonal infusions, while urging her NOT to take ivermectin even though he acknowledges elsewhere it's safe. Terart tracked those infusions down but was not eligible because of her low blood ox. A real doctor would ask her to test her own blood ox before putting her remaining energy into seeking treatment she would be denied. A real doctor would discuss alternatives and options. According to her daughter, Terart eventually went to the hospital and died without treatment (oxygen only). There's a thread record of that damaging fake medical advice here.
A real doctor would know that he couldn't sue me for 'defamation' (saying he wasn't a doctor) as we are both anonymous, but he told me that he was having lunch with his lawyer, and that he hoped a had a large legal defense fund etc. because I say he's not a real doctor. These fake doctors are not harmless - some people trust them .
Thanks!
Gassy also claimed it was wrong to call these mRNA jabs gene therapy. I think because she knew that the gene therapy protocols were not followed in development.
The jabs are clearly a form of gene therapy, by definition. Humans are expressing non-human genes.
Being passed from one generation to another is not a requirement of gene therapy.
Imo - the good dr is not very good.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled This is why a lot of us have stopped watching football, Triple wrote: Thanks!
Gassy also claimed it was wrong to call these mRNA jabs gene therapy. I think because she knew that the gene therapy protocols were not followed in development.
The jabs are clearly a form of gene therapy, by definition. Humans are expressing non-human genes.
Being passed from one generation to another is not a requirement of gene therapy.
Imo - the good dr is not very good.
I do think gas is a nursing student posing as a doctor and it was hard for me to write my post to you reminding myself to use 'he' as many believe it's a he.
I posted early on a section of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) stating that the Covid 'vaccines' are indeed gene therapy but would be allowed to be marketed as 'vaccines' in order to avoid 'vaccine hesitancy'.
I don't believe gas is a doctor, but believe she has a deep psychological need to be perceived as such.
They should use leather helmets again.
Indeed it is. Pretty much all of sports radio is majority gambling interest ad revenue.
Yea…a bit of a mystery why someone would take all the time to post those messages.
Some of them very wrong
Some with self puffery
Some wrongly denigrating others
Strange unwavering support of the fda/pfizer narrative
Many very passionate
Oh, and I refer to gassy as a she, because It just seems to fit the situation. Call it a hunch.
Best,
3
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.