It is more ironic than you can possibly understand that you mention Lysenkoism. Lysenko was an apologist for the Soviet government who tried to force science into a political mold. The problem is that science, which is based in physical reality, cannot be forced to fit some ideological mold.
Yet here you are, trying to alter science to fit a bizarre ideology. Sorry, but humans do not have the ability to force physical reality to fit an ideology, no matter how much they have invested emotionally into that ideology.
The only reason that professional antivaxxers and charlatans try to discredit the role of consensus (i.e. the consistency of observation regardless of observer) is because they are feeding you a line that completely contradicts the science. When tens of thousands of scientists who have studied and analyzed the data conclude that a vaccine is safe, but the professional charlatan is trying to tell you (without any scientific evidence) that the vaccine is dangerous, of course the charlatan wants you to automatically reject any data that the scientific community as a whole accepts. Because otherwise, you might realize that there is something suspicious about the one guy out of tens of thousands who keeps yelling about doom and gloom.
What's more Soviet? Allowing people to make up their own minds, or forcing them to take an under-tested, unsafe jab with severe side effects just to make a few people at the top rich, after scaring everyone with "we're all gonna DIE!" (while Congress and Pfizer exempted themselves)?
Get stuffed, cretin.