Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
it just means that extending U.S. interests to foreign areas would be legitimate if the purpose is to pursue the territorial expansion of the United States if the territory and Congress are on board with pursuing the admission of one or more new states.

There’s my problem. I’m just looking for a definition and method to identify an interest. You have taken it one step too far by creating and stating an interest.

The place I am going with this is pretty simple. If we can agree on the definition of an interest, it allows us to have an argument about what is and what is not an interest. Using your #1 definition (protects the life, liberty and property of Americans;) in your original post works. You can argue about the things in your #3.

I’m not saying #1 is complete or incomplete and I’m not saying #3 should or shouldn’t be an interest.

20 posted on 10/19/2023 10:37:53 AM PDT by ConservativeInPA (Rebuild the Temple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeInPA
All good points.

You have taken it one step too far by creating and stating an interest.

The Constitution lays our a process for admitting new states to the Union, so I just assumed that they implicitly established a national interest in expanding the country under the right conditions.

25 posted on 10/19/2023 12:25:04 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson