[Leaning Right]

> Under Siege was the only Steven Seagal film I really liked. <

That was a good movie. It looks like Seagal got lazy after that one. Most of his movies after Under Siege followed the same tired old formula.

Secret agent Seagal gets a difficult assignment. There is betrayal. There is a love interest half his age. Buildings get blown up. The End.

There is actually a YouTube channel dedicated to mocking Seagal’s later movies. His reviews might be unfair. But they sure are funny. Here’s one:

https://youtu.be/hQaYOjZrhIE?si=1D6ThV2hWoibE4r0

[escapefromboston]

Scott Adkins has a pretty good interview with Steven. He comes off a lot more normal than I expected.

[ansel12]

Funny line from that reviewer.

“and Seagal walks away until he gets to the stairs where his body double takes over”

[LouAvul]

,

[L.A.Justice]

That was a good movie. It looks like Seagal got lazy after that one. Most of his movies after Under Siege followed the same tired old formula.

I have to say that I watched many Steven Segal movies...ABOVE THE LAW...Pam Grier was in the film...HARD TO KILL...EXIT WOUNDS...EXECUTIVE DECISION...Kurt Russell was in that film...I did have fun watching those movies...