Posted on 10/09/2023 2:38:19 PM PDT by frogjerk
“There are over 10,000 cases of anaphylaxis following Covid ‘vaccination’ reported to VAERS”
There’s really just two sorts of people who act like VAERS reports are verified and factual.
One amounts to people who simply don’t understand how VAERS works, and the other is a group who do know but are lying in order to push an agenda.
VAERS is subjective reporting that can be filed by anyone. People have something happen to them after a vaccination and believe that the vaccine had to be the cause. Post hoc reasoning.
The African Union has a similar program, my friend helped manage it, and their VAERS reports sometimes included having your penis shrink. Or worse, fall off. Well it did happen after the vaccine after all. Or not.
The CDC set up VAERS in order to look for patterns developing so that they can see things that warrant investigating. VAERS is statistics. Follow up investigations are verifiable. Conspiracy pushers want you to believe that VAERS itself is composed of verified reports.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Celebrity chef, Food Network host Michael Chiarello dead at 61, TexasGator wrote: |
Me: Do you still believe her claim that the vaccines contain graphene hydroxide (sic)? You: Even Pfizer admits there’s PEG in the vaccines. Do you still believe her claim that the vaccines contain graphene hydroxide (sic)? |
I didn't see that you had changed the subject. What is wrong with the subject of my comment? Why did you feel the need to change it to something else?
“I didn’t see that you had changed the subject. What is wrong with the subject of my comment? Why did you feel the need to change it to something else?”
You referenced Karen Kingston the debunked graphene oxide lady. I was wondering if you still believed that the vaccines contained grahene oxide.
I can’t see the image in your post. That’s fine though. Karen Kingston was not the only people reporting Graphene Oxide in ‘vaccines’. The vials were analyzed by researchers (Spain, Germany and a few in the US) and at that time, graphene oxide was found.
Do you still believe her claim that the vaccines contain graphene oxide?
“I can’t see the image in your post.”
Most of the cases of anaphylaxis (75%) post vaccination published to VAERS are for Covid 'shots'. Of those, 75% occurred within a day of vaccination.
“The vials were analyzed by researchers (Spain, Germany and a few in the US) and at that time, graphene oxide was found.”
Claims that a study from the University of Almería, Spain, found graphene oxide in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, contain numerous inaccuracies. Firstly, the alleged vial of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine analyzed is of unknown origin and traceability. Secondly, the methodology used for the analysis, electron microscopy, is inconclusive. Thirdly, the list of ingredients in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, which can be found in the vaccine’s package insert, don’t include graphene; these package inserts are rigorously reviewed by health authorities. Lastly, the analysis isn’t an official study from the University of Almería, which distanced itself from the analysis and its conclusions.
If the vials contained graphene oxide they would have a dark liquid. The vaccines are clear.
FULL CLAIM: “The group is called La Quinta Columna, the fifth column, and they are associated with the University of Almería, but what they did was they got a Pfizer vial […] and here’s the shocking information” ; ‘These Spanish researchers have found that over 99 percent of the Pfizer vaccine is graphene oxide”
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Celebrity chef, Food Network host Michael Chiarello dead at 61, TexasGator wrote: “The vials were analyzed by researchers (Spain, Germany and a few in the US) and at that time, graphene oxide was found.”
Claims that a study from the University of Almería, Spain, found graphene oxide in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, contain numerous inaccuracies. Firstly, the alleged vial of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine analyzed is of unknown origin and traceability. Secondly, the methodology used for the analysis, electron microscopy, is inconclusive. Thirdly, the list of ingredients in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, which can be found in the vaccine’s package insert, don’t include graphene; these package inserts are rigorously reviewed by health authorities. Lastly, the analysis isn’t an official study from the University of Almería, which distanced itself from the analysis and its conclusions.
Your linked website is propaganda. Every statement made against Climate Change and the Covid Vaccine is met with a barrage of propaganda denouncing people like Dr. McCullough and others. Dr. McCullough saved lives with his protocols - something the CDC never managed to do. So I support people like Dr. McCullough and reject agencies like the one you linked which attack critics of CLimate Change and Covid Vaccine cautions outright. Fact Check organizations are usually Deep State sources - President Trump has countless 'fact checks' against him, all claiming he's a traitor, liar, thief etc.
“Your linked website is propaganda.”
Facts you cannot refute so you attack the messenger.
Am I now to assume that you agree with the claim that the shots are 99.9% Graphene?
“The vials were analyzed by researchers (Spain, Germany and a few in the US) and at that time, graphene oxide was found.”
The author in Spain says only one vial.
Cite the researchers in the U.S and Germany.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Celebrity chef, Food Network host Michael Chiarello dead at 61, TexasGator wrote: “Your linked website is propaganda.”
Facts you cannot refute so you attack the messenger.
Am I now to assume that you agree with the claim that the shots are 99.9% Graphene?
I don't believe the globalist lies about Climate Change but the website you linked acts to 'debunk' any criticism of it. I would have to spend all my waking hours going through that propaganda site to refute it - WHY? Why should I bother. You cited a worthless source to back your claims; why should this take my time? You will no doubt assume anything you want to, free from fact or legitimate source. You'll focus on changing the subject and diluting the topic with waste-of-time comments and fake sources.
“You’ll focus on changing the subject”
You are the one that brought up Karen Kingston, not me. Since your reference to her claims was inaccurate your credibility is suspect.
“I would have to spend all my waking hours going through that propaganda site to refute it”
Just try to debunk the facts related to the sampled vial I quoted.
Me: Am I now to assume that you agree with the claim that the shots are 99.9% Graphene?
Am I now to assume that you agree with the claim that the shots are 99.9% Graphene Oxide and/or Graphene Hydroxide?
So you’re still changing the subject and diluting the thread? The content must really worry you to deflect away from it so much.
Vax. Had to be.
“So you’re still changing the subject and diluting the thread? The content must really worry you to deflect away from it so much.”
You started the dilution by intruding false claims about vaccines totally unrelated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
