Most of the cases of anaphylaxis (75%) post vaccination published to VAERS are for Covid 'shots'. Of those, 75% occurred within a day of vaccination.
“There are over 10,000 cases of anaphylaxis following Covid ‘vaccination’ reported to VAERS”
There’s really just two sorts of people who act like VAERS reports are verified and factual.
One amounts to people who simply don’t understand how VAERS works, and the other is a group who do know but are lying in order to push an agenda.
VAERS is subjective reporting that can be filed by anyone. People have something happen to them after a vaccination and believe that the vaccine had to be the cause. Post hoc reasoning.
The African Union has a similar program, my friend helped manage it, and their VAERS reports sometimes included having your penis shrink. Or worse, fall off. Well it did happen after the vaccine after all. Or not.
The CDC set up VAERS in order to look for patterns developing so that they can see things that warrant investigating. VAERS is statistics. Follow up investigations are verifiable. Conspiracy pushers want you to believe that VAERS itself is composed of verified reports.
Most of the cases of anaphylaxis (75%) post vaccination published to VAERS are for Covid 'shots'. Of those, 75% occurred within a day of vaccination.
Pelham your content is always so low wattage I sigh out of boredom responding to you.
"VAERS is subjective reporting that can be filed by anyone. People have something happen to them after a vaccination and believe that the vaccine had to be the cause. Post hoc reasoning."
I watched a video of someone actually filing a VAERS report. The filed report was not posted to VAERS at the conclusion. Instead the filer received a code to use later. The notice VAERS produced said that the CDC has 6 - 8 weeks to review the content. So if someone posted content the CDC didn't like, they don't publish it to VAERS. This is certainly true because statisticians have caught the CDC deleting records that reflect negatively on the Covid 'vaccine.
