Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

55 Presumed Dead After China's Nuclear Sub Gets Caught In Trap Meant For US, Its Allies: Reports
IBT ^ | 10/5/2023 | initha Jacob

Posted on 10/07/2023 6:23:55 AM PDT by logi_cal869

A Chinese nuclear submarine got caught in a trap intended for U.S. or British submarines in the Yellow Sea, killing 55 people on board, multiple reports claimed. However, Beijing has not yet released any information to corroborate or deny the catastrophic accident.

The news outlets, citing a British intelligence report, said 22 officers, seven officer cadets, nine petty officers and 17 sailors were killed in an accident involving a Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) nuclear submarine on Aug. 21.

International Business Times could not independently verify the information.

If true, the incident "reflects poorly on the PLA Navy's capabilities," Niranjan Oak, a research analyst at Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defense Studies and Analyses in New Delhi, told IBT.

PLA Navy submarine 093-417 was reportedly involved in the accident. The Shang-class submarine got caught in seabed defenses that were installed by Chinese forces to trap U.S. and allied submarines. It ran out of oxygen, killing 55 on board, the reports said.

"Our understanding is death caused by hypoxia (lack of oxygen) due to a system fault on the submarine," British intelligence officials reportedly said. "The submarine hit a chain and anchor obstacle used by the Chinese navy to trap U.S. and allied submarines. This resulted in systems failures that took six hours to repair and surface the vessel. The onboard oxygen system poisoned the crew after a catastrophic failure."

(Excerpt) Read more at ibtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: ccp; china; chinkinthearmor; fail; nuclearsubmarine; nyuknyuknyuk; sinking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 last
To: logi_cal869

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_093_submarine#Ships_of_class


61 posted on 09/26/2024 3:48:55 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Holy cow: I’m sure there’s a story behind digging that up from a year ago.

When I saw your comment I thought you were referencing this

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4267410/posts

(it’s late)

I’m just guessing that the ccp will label the latest reports of another sub sinking as ‘false’ as well... /s


62 posted on 09/26/2024 10:43:29 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869; ansel12

Actually that was meant for ansel12 since his post referred to a hull number from a different class than then Zhou-class...and the hull number referenced (17 I think) has been deleted from Wikipedia.


63 posted on 09/27/2024 9:45:53 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson