[hardspunned]

Heck, that was a very credible site compared to this bunch of lying, half wit, rainbow warrior dipshits. But this is going strait to horse’s ass for confirmation just for you.

https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2023/09/29/the-urgent-imperative-to-maintain-natos-nuclear-deterrence/index.html

[Wuli]

NATO review admits they do not represent any official NATO policy.

[Wuli]

“Heck, that was a very credible site.”

Based on what??? They - in Pakistan - cut and pasted remarks from an opinion in NATO Reviews own admission admittedly does not represent NATO policy - just an opinion by one man. That makes them “credible”???