Posted on 10/07/2023 1:26:03 AM PDT by Jonty30
Liberals are constantly saying that fascism is a right-wing belief system, because that's how the university education system allocated it.
We both know that's bs, because Mussolini and Gentile were quite clear that they were creating a socialist political system that has all the markings of left-wing socialism.
When somebody says that fascism is right-wing, they are not defining it as right-wing objectively, but subjectively. Relative to themselves because they are to the left of fascism, making them communists or that thin sliver that sits between communism and fascism.
However, it doesn't matter. What I realized is that they are on the side of big government, with all the other big government political systems of liberalism, socialism, communism, and fascism.
They are on the side of those that murdered 250 million people, enslaved over a billion, started the majority of major 20th century wars and aborted over 2 billion unborn children. Liberals are on that side.
That's what I realized.
Yes, however Mussolini was committed to the system he helped co-create with Giovanni Gentile. Hitler wavered in either direction in accordance to his needs and desires at the moment.
Hitler was pragmatic, before the war. He became anything but that once he invaded The Soviet Union.
His pragmatism, I think, wasn’t ideological just for himself. He had no loyalties himself beyond how it served him. If it served him, any of his loyalists would end up in the same death camps as everybody else.
That’s why he started out communism, became a fascist, and then worked toward becoming a communist again once he was secure in his power.
Stalin was much worse, though in that department. He’d have someone killed just because they were popular, see Sergei Kirov.
Stalin was distrustful of anyone associated with Leningrad, because he felt he couldn’t have the control there. He had most of the political figures associated with the Seige of Leningrad killed after the war.
They are busybody bullies and Authoritarians.
Stalin was a bad dude. Just as sociopathic as Hitler. However, Stalin didn’t seem to have globalists intentions. He was happy with the Soviet Union as it was.
Hitler had his eye on the rest of the world, once he secured Europe. He broke his treaty with Russia, to access the oil, but he was going to do that anyway when the time was right.
Always.
Stalin was a bad dude. Just as sociopathic as Hitler. However, Stalin didn’t seem to have globalists intentions. He was happy with the Soviet Union as it was.
Originally Stalin was the real “National Socialist”, he only believed in that Internationalism stuff, as far as it achieved traditional Russian geopolitical goals. However, at the end of WWII, he became much more interested in globalist intentions.
If that is the case, then Stalin and Hitler were basically the same person because Hitler had that mindset as well. Global conquest under Germany.
Stalin only signed the Non-Agression Pact with Hitler, thinking it would just be another war of attrition in the West, that would bleed all the armies dry, and allow the Soviets to swoop in. Then France fell in six weeks, and once Hitler was able to more or less neutralize Britain, he was able to strike at Russia.
And Hitler had no choice, but to strike as soon as possible, because the Soviet Union would have only gotten stronger as time passed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.