Posted on 10/06/2023 12:24:15 PM PDT by ransomnote
The World Health Organization is already working on a Global Digital Health Certification Network — an interlinked, global technological system that would be used to recognize the validity of health certificates and vaccine passports. Experts told The Defender the system is designed to restrict people’s freedom to travel.
The World Health Organization (WHO) is moving ahead with a Global Digital Health Certification Network (GDHCN) — an interlinked, global technological system that would be used to recognize the validity of health certificates and “vaccine passports” — according to independent journalist James Roguski and others who spoke with The Defender.
“In reality, the WHO is not waiting for the negotiations to be finalized,” Roguski said. “They are already moving forward with the construction and implementation of a global system that is designed to restrict your freedom to travel.”
The “negotiations” is a reference to next month’s meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, where the WHO’s Working Group on Amendments to the International Health Regulations (WGIHR) is set to begin negotiating proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR).
The IHR is a binding international law governing public health and global health emergencies. The WGIHR is composed of representatives of 196 nation-states negotiating proposals for amendments to the IHR.
In all, 307 amendments have been proposed for the IHR by 16 entities, on behalf of 94 countries — including amendments to formalize the creation of a globally interlinked system of health certificates that would be recognized by all WHO member states.
Roguski, who has investigated the workings of the WHO and the proposed IHR amendment negotiations and “pandemic treaty,” said that while the pandemic treaty has garnered more attention, it is the IHR amendments that contain proposals for such “certificates.”
Author and podcast host Frank Gaffney, founder and president of the Center for Security Policy, echoed Roguski’s concerns about the IHR amendments and GDHCN.
Gaffney told The Defender:
“What’s very alarming to me, and I think many others, is that we’re looking at the prospect that the international arrangements that are being put into place will have as their sort of critical infrastructure if you will, this kind of global identification, the capability and that it will be abused to exercise control over people irrespective of the rights, for example, that they enjoy under our constitution. And in fact, I think very much to the detriment of those rights.”
The proposals under consideration
The provisional agenda and draft program for the Oct. 2-6 WGIHR meeting list “consideration of proposed amendments” to IHR articles regarding “points of entry” and “public health measures” — specifically with regard to travel and conveyances, — and “health documents” as the main topics of discussion.
Roguski said the WGIHR proposals are not limited to vaccine passports, but also encompass prophylaxis certificates, testing certificates, recovery certificates, passenger locator forms and travelers’ health declarations.
MORE AT LINK: ‘Creating a Digital Prison’: WHO Rushes Ahead on Global Digital Health Certificates
COVID PING
Illegal aliens will be exempt, right?
A shot to eliminate communism would be more beneficial.
That does exist, and helicopter rides can be substituted.
😆
It’s time to go full Pinochet.
I agree.
🚁
🤸🏻
Illegal aliens will be exempt, right?
Always!
😡
They will be our overlords.
As the growing tally of a negative impact on worldwide tourism continues to be confirmed, it will be a contest between "control" and "freedom of travel." I predict that freedom will win, in the end.
When retiring and relocating back to the states some years back, we'd planned on dropping some luxurious amount of Euros on touring many places we'd had on a list. Talk of mandates and the so-called "green pass" and more, we opted to relocate directly, skipping our plans to tour northern Europe and the British Isles. The tourism industry could have benefited, had we spent Euros and Sterling there. Nope. We lost some few opportunities, while the tourism industry lost as much as 20K € and ₤ 10K. Saved the money planned for there, and then spent it here instead.
If the WHO game gets adopted -- which was the "green pass" as the EU elite spoke of it as early as 2014 -- we will enjoy much we have not seen here. WHO wins; global tourism looses.
as an American citizen I view the WHO with the respect as used spit since it has no jurisdiction over me or my state and local authorities. They can pound sand and I could care less.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.