Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Oh damn! Did they have that tech back then? Pierre Salenger said it was friendly fire.


6 posted on 09/27/2023 6:07:57 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: mware

mware wrote: “Oh damn! Did they have that tech back then? Pierre Salenger said it was friendly fire.”

Red Badger wrote: “TWA 800..................”

TWA was over 13,000 feet. This weapon doesn’t have that kind of range. Besides the friendly fire theory has been debunked many times.


13 posted on 09/27/2023 6:12:00 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: mware

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phalanx_CIWS


15 posted on 09/27/2023 6:12:06 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: mware
Oh damn! Did they have that tech back then? Pierre Salenger said it was friendly fire.

Yes, they had the tech back then, but at the altitude TWA 8 00 exploded was much higher than the effective range of the CIWS.

The most logical explanation (translation: the one I tend to believe) is that someone from a civilian boat launched a MANPADS missile at the 747.

We were passing out MANPADS missiles to the Afghan rebels during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, so there were quite a few of them on the black market at the time.

22 posted on 09/27/2023 6:23:37 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson