Posted on 09/26/2023 3:29:41 PM PDT by Morgana
Socking? I think not when it comes to those people...
Po’ folk on both ends of the transaction. Retail stores don’t argue on returned merchandise. Fast food joints? I’d give them the fries but these minimum wage workers have no say and take all the $hit.
Me? I check everything but I order just for me. A family of 3 has 3 chances to get it wrong.
She threw packets of ketchup and other stuff at him and he tossed them out of his truck. She then got out her gun and started firing.
With that said, it looks like she should have been behind bars instead of working at a Jack-in-the-Box.
Everyone knows that if you want fries you go to McDonalds.
Minister euology: As for so many of us, loss to a family has again occurred over the common breaking point for rage: the french fries order.
Father arrested after ordering son, 4, to shoot at officers in ...
NBC News
https://www.nbcnews.com › news › us-news › father-ar...
Feb 22, 2022 — A man was arrested Monday after allegedly ordering his 4-year-old son to shoot at Utah police officers at a McDonald’s drive-thru.
Newsweek
https://www.newsweek.com › ... › Texas › Police
Jul 7, 2021 — An investigation found that Guillory and Cohen entered into an argument with the manager at the restaurant over salt on their fries.
Yahoo News
https://www.yahoo.com › lifestyle › customer-shot-e...
Mar 30, 2023 — A 16-year-old Burger King employee has been arrested after police said he shot a customer with the customer’s own gun during a fight over sauce.
MLive.com
https://www.mlive.com › incorrect_burger_orders_lead_t
Feb 10, 2014 — After receiving a series of incorrect orders, a Grand Rapids woman became verbally abusive and fired one round of bullets into a McDonald’s.
Yep, if it’s crazy chit like this, we pretty much know.
Why do you think that? Again I can only speak to CA law: vicarious liability of the employer does not extend to criminal acts of the employee, unless the employer knew or should have known of the employee’s propensity for violence. Why should it be otherwise? And, just because you have a cause of action doesn’t mean you’ve hit the jackpot and get to just start pulling numbers out of the air. It doesn’t appear the family was actually injured. JIB will be eager to settle just to clean up the PR mess. A quarter mil sounds about right. He’ll, I’d counsel them to take $100 or 150K, since JIB would win the case at summary judgment, and, of course, a judgment against the perp would be worthless
A man got 2.7 million when a McDonalds employee spilled hot coffee on him!
And your telling me shooting at a family isn’t worse than that?
“Impulse control is lacking in certain species.”
non native species
“Impulse control is lacking in certain species.”
non native species
If Obama had a son he would look just like this woman.
Classic escalation. Exactly how WWI started, except all people remember is Princip throwing .380ACP at the Archduke.
OMG. Why did the policeman pull up to the window if someone had shot out of it????
Never order the hot lead.
And my order of fries.
It was a woman. She sustained actual injuries; these people fortunately escaped injury. There’s a flaw in the jury system. I think that was a run away jury, and I would not have awarded a verdict of that size. There’s no mathematical formula to calculate what appropriate damages in this case would be, but you can draw rough comparisons, and a quarter million sounds about right
But remember what I said: if the law there is similar to CA, then the employer has no liability at all. That has a serious drag on the settlement value of the case, since PR is the only reason why the employer will offer anything at all
Yep.
I guess the father asked for a side order of LEAD.
I think the livestock that went into the making of that food had a few IQ points on this sorry thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.