This version is owned by one man as of now. Company profile: https://tracxn.com/d/companies/poe/__5KUJ1oNQTW9Wy3n77CVWAMu-SgMqgVpp5K11FvAy1CY
When asked "Who owns and programs you?, it replied:
I am an AI language model created by OpenAI. My development involved a large team of researchers, engineers, and scientists who worked on designing and training me. However, I don't have a specific owner in the traditional sense as I am a product of OpenAI, which is an organization that oversees my development and deployment.
When asked, "Are you capable of independent thinking. meaning going beyond simply providing information by compiling answers from different sources?" it replied:
As an AI language model, I don't possess consciousness or independent thinking. While I can generate responses based on the information I've been trained on, I don't have personal opinions, thoughts, or beliefs. My responses are generated by analyzing patterns and information from the training data, which includes a wide range of sources. I strive to provide helpful and accurate information, but it's important to verify and cross-reference any critical or sensitive information from reliable sources.
Grace as compiled by gigabyte gobbler
Thank you for the post. I have gotten a little grief here from a small number for looking forward to what AI can bring and this is an excellent example of how that tool can be used.
There's the rub! In the end, AI spouts information from a source or sources. Whatever or whoever is that "source" portends to be truth and facts. Let's take for instance that Hitler won WW2 and the tenants of Nazism were the "source" for all truth. How would AI work in that world. Today, the CCP dictates what truth is in every strata of their society. This is reflected in their literature, media, business, gov religion and internet. Let's say the CCP dominates the world. They're almost there now. What does AI look like under a CCP controlled and dominated world?
Although not AI, let's look at Wiki as a somewhat parallel for accessing info. Here's a source that supposedly is objective. It's anything but.