Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Salthawk

They are banking on an ethics ruse.
Trumps lawyers wouldn’t be able to cross examine him about the election since Wood represented Trump in multiple filings.
Prosecution can selectively question Wood, limit his replies and make his promises follow their narrative.


866 posted on 09/20/2023 3:27:39 PM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Cracker...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 865 | View Replies ]


To: Cletus.D.Yokel

promises s/b responses


867 posted on 09/20/2023 3:28:26 PM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Cracker...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 866 | View Replies ]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

They are banking on an ethics ruse.
Trumps lawyers wouldn’t be able to cross examine him about the election since Wood represented Trump in multiple filings.
Prosecution can selectively question Wood, limit his replies and make his promises follow their narrative.
_________________________________________________

That could be what their plan is. I may be wrong, but I think the client, President Trump, can waive the privilege that attaches to his conversations with his attorney Wood. If Wood is a BH, it would be fun if President Trump recorded all of their conversations so that lies told by attorney Wood after PDJT waives his privilege can be challenged.


881 posted on 09/20/2023 4:55:08 PM PDT by LittleLinda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 866 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson