Translation: Let Russia invade other European countries, waging war and grabbing land, without consequence.
Because, effectively, that's the only alternative you are left with.
Doesn't jibe very well with maintaining the European Peace Architecture after WWII, like we did from 1945 to 1990, does it?
I take it that you would have been among those sniveling cowards, fellow travelers, and "peaceniks" who, after Hitler's defeat, advocated simply going home and leaving Europe to the "tender mercies" of marauding Soviet hordes, right?
Because: What's the difference between then and now, really?
And "bankrupting" our nation?! Seriously?!
U.S. aid to Ukraine barely amounts to a drop in the bucket!
Every dollar sent to Ukraine delivers a Return-on-Investment a hundredfold! Our aid in the last 18 months has done more to neutralize the Soviet Russian military threat potential to our country and curb Russian imperialism and expansionism than anything we did in the previous ten years!
Regards,
The end of this war cannot be anything less than total destruction of all things Russian.
This will be the outcome, even if the complete opposite happens.
Because that is what the media will report. And if it does not do so loudly enough, the array of wacko bloggers will claim the media is pretending to be measured in its positions, but everyone knows all things Russian have been destroyed.
“Every dollar sent to Ukraine delivers a Return-on-Investment a hundredfold! Our aid in the last 18 months has done more to neutralize the Soviet Russian military threat potential to our country and curb Russian imperialism and expansionism than anything we did in the previous ten years!”
That’s BS. What’s going to stop them from rebuilding everything after the war is over? We’ll be out hundreds of billions and back at square one.