Posted on 09/04/2023 6:56:06 AM PDT by bitt
A groundbreaking new peer-reviewed study has found that ivermectin use in COVID-19 patients during the pandemic resulted in a staggering 74 percent reduction in excess deaths.
According to the ecological study, a natural experiment occurred when the government of Peru authorized ivermectin for use during the pandemic.
The Peruvian government’s decision resulted in evidence of the drug’s effectiveness and ability to reduce excess deaths.
The situation in Peru was unique as other governments around the world had banned the use of ivermectin for Covid patients in an effort to promote mRNA vaccines.
The paper’s results were published on August 8 in the renowned peer-reviewed Cureus Journal of Medical Science.
The peer-reviewed study found a 74 percent reduction in excess deaths in 10 states with the most intensive ivermectin use over a 30-day period following peak deaths during the pandemic.
When analyzing data across 25 states in Peru, researchers found these reductions in excess deaths correlated closely to ivermectin use during four months in 2020.
There was a fourteenfold reduction in nationwide excess deaths when ivermectin was available without restriction.
Once access to ivermectin was restricted by the government, a thirteenfold increase in excess deaths was observed in the two months following the limitation of its use.
(Excerpt) Read more at slaynews.com ...
Remember, the corruption ALL starts at the top. Once the feds made the decision to ‘vaccinate’, EVERY entity had to follow it, as an deviation would be SEVERELY PUNISHED (through means such as license revocation, lawsuits, criminal charges, etc.).
The ONLY other entities that could stop the top-down commandment to ‘vaccinate’ was other countries, and most of them figured that we had all of the experts and none of the usual corruption. Boy were they wrong, but thankfully some countries, like Peru here and India, at least tried deviating a bit and showed us that Ivermectin could easily knock down this virus, and Central Africa did the same by default, as they were already taking Ivermectin to prevent River Blindness.
The only good thing to come out of this crap was that much of the public, or at least Conservatives, know just how corrupt the medical profession is and now understand that their doctor does not necessarily act in their interests as he also answers to other masters (hospitals, medical boards, insurance companies, drug companies, etc.).
So there’s a normal actuarial death rate for Covid. Ivmctn reduces the excess of that by 74%. I find that difficult to follow.
It was banned. Do you have any?
Might have been nice to have a little push back against Pfizer and Moderna and making Fauci king.
Hydrochloroquine, Ivermectin and vitamins just could not win against a virus that originated from a pengulin. Don’t say CHYNA.
Oh well.
Excess deaths is a statistical measure. It looks at a “normal” death count for a period (week, month, year) and then that number is subtracted from the actual deaths. The remainder (+ or -) is called “Excess deaths.”
Go to this page and scroll down to the chart on the bottom.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm
The periods of highest COVID deaths are pretty obvious. Not so much in the past year or so. This chart is updated weekly/monthly. You can play around with it to show states and demographics.
Yes, it is the CDC…so many will think the numbers are fixed. But…read at your own caution.
The end result is that all of the talk about young people dropping dead at a higher rate is not supported by the statistics.
+++++
I took the Ivermectin paste marketed for horses to help get over Covid. I added it to peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. It didn't mess up the flavor of the sandwich and with a little milk it was very easy to swallow... even with a sore throat.
As far as to whether it causes a reduction in the Covid death rate... it probably does. This is just one more study showing that it was effective. There is a parade of other studies showing the same thing, despite efforts by the media and authorities to keep them out of the view of the public.
When there is an effective treatment, the need for emergency mandates for the horrible MRNA concoctions goes away.
Statistics and young people dropping dead has zero to do with what this article is about. The article is about the effectiveness of ivermectin
It was already banned. Now they're having to admit they were wrong.
Not gonna be able to ban it again.
Ivermectin WAS constructively banned. But it was and still is among the more effective drugs available, when the immediate spike in COVID-19 infections began spreading like wildfire throughout the world.
“Quick, Henry, smash all the fire extinguishers!”
Like the fire drill in Lahaina, Maui.
“The situation in Peru was unique as other governments around the world had banned the use of ivermectin for Covid patients in an effort to promote mRNA vaccines.”
Which, btw, also made the pharmaceuticals hundreds of billions of dollars. And suddenly the bureacratic heads of health care became rich.
That much is understood
Paging Dr. Fraudxi.
Your gallow is waiting.
“Perhaps the biggest lesson of Covid was the extent to which Big Pharma controls Big Public Health, Big Media, Big Medicine, Big Government.”
and small minds
When Trump mentioned ivermectin the media went nuts. There was no time to research what he’d said. If Trump said it, it had to be ridiculed instantly. I wonder that if Trump had not mentioned ivermectin whether it would have been used. I’m not sure what percentage Trump’s mention of ivermectin contributed to the crazy response to it, but I’d guess fifty percent.
You asked a question. I answered it. I suggested a relevant statistic to help you understand.
Ivermectin doesn’t matter for a disease that isn’t killing anyone who isn’t in shit condition to begin with.
Exactly true !
Big Pharma contributes to Public Health and helps fund NIH/FDA/CDC in the area of 60% of funding sources.
Big Pharma contributes to Big Media (Newspapers, Television, and radio) through paid advertizments. Check out late TV for example.
It was Big Government that mandated that the general population, first responders, military personnel, and healthcare personnel
all get the biologic injection, or get fired by their employer.
Without the agreement from Public Health (rewrite definition of vaccine), Big Media (propaganda and daily rate of infection), Big Pharma , and Big Government,
the untested mRNA experimental vaccine might not have been agreed to by the general population.
I bought and read both Kory's "The War on Ivermectin" and Kennedy's "The Real Anthony Fauci," and doublechecked a number of the footnotes. Some in our circle bought one or both, but did not have the discipline to wade through the long-ish texts.
From Kory (p.264) --
The evolution of evidence-based medicine into what I now call "evidence-based mania" is a result of what I see as a near complete disavowal of the method's we've relied upon to determine new therapies for hundreds of years. These include a combination of knowledge of pathophysiology and pharmacological mechanisms, empirical data, and the clinical experiences gleaned from close observation of hundreds if not thousands of patients with a similar disease or symptoms."We were in Berlin when, in January of 2020, Drosten coded that first PCR test from Chinese data -- text -- not samples, and February of 2020 when the Commission atop the EU adopted that test BEFORE the pandemic was declared. Throughout the ensuing years, I have calculated the real mortality rate based on "official" data and after 3 1/2 years, the mortality rate over the entire period stands at about less than one-tenth of one percent, when the mortality rate in most Western nations is about one percent per year. The manipulation of the data and conclusions about it have been extraorindary.
For me and after reading many of the more obscure NIH papers as well, this has been a media-amplified hoax. Cui bono? Politicians seeking to practice control of citizens. Pharma companies seeking to force "uptake" of products. The WHO seeking more power.
We are retired, home to the states. I arranged for med-grade ivermectin from my physician before the "war on ivermectin" became so heated. Edenbridge Pharmaceuticals provided ours, and the pharmacy filled before the pharmacies became "compliant."
I suspect that ivermectin will remain an issue for pharmaceuticals wishing to suppress it, because it is 1) out of patent, 2) used worldwide, 3) inexpensive to produce, and 4) shows promise not only as an anti-parasitic, but also in other areas of health treatment.
Kennedy ends his text (p.433) with a section entitled "Covid-19: A Military Project." I think there is much yet left to be uncovered through FOIA and civil suits now ongoing which will further clarify that the hoax and especially resulting lockdowns were an attack on not only the American people, but the world at large. For the benefit of a very small but well-connected coterie of people still embedded in the administrative state. The Gordian knots do not need to be untied. They need to be cut through.
Never forget we had an emergency ‘pandemic’ where emergency measures should have been allowed and instead they squashed them. Let’s say there’s a grease fire in the kitchen but no fire extinguishers. However there are blankets nearby and used to curtail the flames. You use whatever you have in an emergency to neutralize the threat. What they did was criminal to squash the use of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine. All because the deep pockets of Big Pharma was the sugar daddy to grab their$ and distribute the taxpayer candie$ to the other elite$ downstream. Criminals masquerading as protectors of the national health.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.