To: Apparatchik
“...the old Copperhead rounds we used to train to shoot and hardly even used in Desert Storm, and eventually scrapped them.”
How does Excalibur do on moving targets ?
42 posted on
08/31/2023 8:03:46 PM PDT by
Reverend Wright
( Everything touched by progressives, dies !)
To: Reverend Wright
How does Excalibur do on moving targets?
Indeed, not well. But then again, the high-value targets one might shoot at with a $70,000 round are typically not moving - command posts, ammo dumps, etc. The GPS-guided Excalibur only needs accurate grid coords, not some shlub with a laser designator with direct observation to paint the target and thereby paint himself as a target. But sure, spend 7 million rubles to hit one moving vehicle….
50 posted on
08/31/2023 8:13:50 PM PDT by
Apparatchik
(If you find yourself in a confusing situation, simply laugh knowingly and walk away - Jim Ignatowski)
To: Reverend Wright
“How does Excalibur do on moving targets ?”
Poorly. But that is because the US gave up on trying to make Copperhead work. It was too difficult to use a laser designator at combat ranges. A fire and forget missile like Javelin was easier to use and safer.
That was besides the inherent problems of maneuvering a fast ballistic projectile in real time.
I doubt that the Russians have solved the problems in tracking moving ground targets, and of maneuvering ballistic projectiles.
54 posted on
08/31/2023 8:19:43 PM PDT by
buwaya
(Strategic imperatives )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson