stray voters
In this case, very possibly.
However, this is being posted to assist humans, as unlikely as it may seem. Item bothering most is that this was 1) successful, and 2) necessary. See below additional excerpt:
(note: am an animal lover, but humans come first.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Who to sue?
The first of those reasons was “To clear a line of communication and avoid misinformation while finding a nonlegal solution that will permit all to grasp a fuller understanding of the statutory grounds invoked to prohibit access vis-a-vis the constitutional rights of Lahainans to recover their ‘property,’ including likely support animals protected by federal law.”
The second reason, “Barring resolution,” was to “know who to notify should I file a federal action in Hawaii District Court seeking a temporary restraining order,” to be argued on the next business day.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
That stick of legal dynamite seemed to loosen the log jam. . . .” . . .