Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What’s Up with America’s Multi-billion Dollar Air Defense Systems? (Why are Chinese balloons, UFOs/UAPs, drones, and other stuff flying in our restricted airspace with impunity?)
christophermellon.net ^ | Chris Mellon, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence

Posted on 08/28/2023 2:21:22 PM PDT by RoosterRedux

In 2017, Lue Elizondo and I made senior policymakers in the Administration and Congress aware that unidentified aircraft were routinely violating sensitive, restricted airspace off the East Coast of the U.S. This was soon confirmed on Capitol Hill by the testimony of U.S. Navy aviators. Although not as prolific elsewhere, it turned out that similar incidents were occurring near U.S. warships off the West Coast and over DoD test ranges in other parts of the country.

Then, earlier this year, we learned that China sent an instrumented intelligence collection platform across the U.S. using a high-altitude balloon. It now appears this activity may also have been going on for years. In the immediate aftermath of the balloon shootdown, several other objects were also engaged and shot down by U.S. fighter aircraft. One of these, a cylindrical object floating over the Arctic, reportedly interfered with the sensor systems onboard the U.S. fighter aircraft that shot it down. This pattern of interference with sensors aboard advanced U.S. fighter aircraft has occurred in a number of cases, including a case that came to light during a recent Congressional hearing on the UAP issue.

Meanwhile, beginning in 2018, as a direct result of Congressional action, DoD began instructing personnel to report rather than conceal UAP sightings. The result has been an explosion of UAP reports. The government acknowledged 144 official UAP reports from 2004-2021. Now, less than two years later, the number is over 800 official reports. Many cases have been explained, but hundreds of cases remain unexplained. That is all strange enough, but the vast majority of these 800 reports seem to be coming from pilots and aviators rather than America's massive, multi-billion dollar automated air and space surveillance systems.This seems distinctly odd, as though NORAD and America’s SSPAR radars are either failing to detect UAP or failing to report those incidents to the new All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) and to Congress.

Indeed, I managed to confirm a prominent example of a UAP incident that led NORAD to scramble F-15 fighter aircraft that was not reported to AARO or Congress. This case involved a high-flying fast vehicle that overflew a large area of the Western U.S in 2018. The craft was detected by FAA radars and its location was independently confirmed by commercial airline pilots. F-15s failed to get close to the object which, as far as we know, remains unidentified. Yet, when I contacted AARO, the organization confirmed that this extraordinary case, which only came to light by chance, had not been reported to it by the Air Force. How many more cases like this have not been reported? In light of that case and the Chinese balloon mishap, and the hundreds of ongoing unexplained UAP reports, I suggest Congress balance its focus on UAP with a hard look at the performance and effectiveness of the air and space surveillance systems that we rely on to protect the nation from surprise attacks like Pearl Harbor or September 11th.

The massive air and space surveillance systems funded by the taxpayer at huge expense include the most powerful radar emitters on the planet. They closely monitor vast regions of air and space 24 hours per day 365 days per year. It is technically inconceivable that these systems do not detect anomalies from time to time. They should certainly be seeing UAP independently of fighter aircraft, yet aside from the Chinese balloon and the 3 other objects shot down in the following days, I don’t know of any reports of that kind going to AARO or Congress. How come these massive and redundant systems do not seem to be independently reporting UAP? Why were they unable to supply radar data to help explain the famous Nimitz incident in 2004 when the intense UAP activity tracked by the USS Princeton for several days off the coast of Southern California was occurring almost directly in front of the giant phased array radar at Beale AFB? The most likely answer is that these systems indeed are detecting UAP on a regular basis, but NORAD is not releasing that information to Congress or the All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) that Congress created to oversee UAP collection and analysis. This could simply be another case of excessive government classification, but that should not prevent members of the Armed Services and Intelligence Committees from getting answers and working to ensure this information is reaching AARO.

If America’s air defense system is indeed failing to detect and report these unidentified craft, notwithstanding generous Congressional support of USAF requests for tens of billions of dollars in recent decades, don’t we need to fix that? I strongly suggest Congress look closely at the sources of the over 800 military UAP reports to date to determine which sensors are proving most and least effective in monitoring U.S. airspace and detecting UAP. That is vitally important and can be easily done by simply asking the Air Force to supply the data. While they’re looking into this, I also suggest Congress ask for a list of all the instances in which fighter aircraft on strip alert have been launched to intercept UAP over the last 10 years. This is important for determining how frequently these UAP are actually being detected, where incidents are occurring, and the outcomes of these attempted intercepts. This is another easy-but-important-ask for evaluating the performance of America’s air defense systems and the frequency and nature of UAP intrusions.

The tragedies of Pearl Harbor and September 11th both involved failures of our air defense systems. The extraterrestrial hypothesis is a valid and serious issue, but that controversial topic should not distract Congress from its important duty to assess the effectiveness of America’s air and space surveillance systems. From a national security standpoint, the country needs to know how effectively this massive and complex system is functioning. That won’t happen until Congress presses for answers regarding the performance of systems whose effectiveness have recently been brought into doubt by the Chinese balloon incident and the soaring number of UAP reports from U.S. military personnel. Answers to these questions could also provide substantial new insights into the nature and extent of UAP activity over the U.S.


TOPICS: UFO's
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Links at Source
1 posted on 08/28/2023 2:21:22 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Openurmind; Churchjack; eastforker; Levy78; maddog55; Jonty30; GingisK; Mark17; spirited irish; ...

Ping


2 posted on 08/28/2023 2:22:00 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (A person who seeks the truth with a strong bias will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Because our government and miltary let them.

Simple as that.


3 posted on 08/28/2023 2:22:55 PM PDT by rlmorel ("If you think tough men are dangerous, just wait until you see what weak men are capable of." JBP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
FR Rules (Source at FR):

Do not enter onto a thread on a topic you don't like just to disrupt, rattle cages, poke sticks, insult the regulars, or engage in trolling activities, etc.

4 posted on 08/28/2023 2:23:56 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (A person who seeks the truth with a strong bias will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

PAPER TIGER….


5 posted on 08/28/2023 2:26:35 PM PDT by ncfool (America has died we are living in the united socialist states of aMeriKa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

China Joe was paid to let them.


6 posted on 08/28/2023 2:26:51 PM PDT by wbslws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

What really matters in the military these days is that trans soldiers can get their operations done in a timely manner anywhere around the globe.

Notice how they define “readiness” these days:

https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/130028p.pdf


7 posted on 08/28/2023 2:27:11 PM PDT by cgbg ("Creative minds have always been known to survive any kind of bad training." Anna Freud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Or can’t stop them.


8 posted on 08/28/2023 2:27:18 PM PDT by FrankRizzo890
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
It may be a matter of priorities. Drones were buzzing our nuclear aircraft carriers but the crew was busy attending an official performance of the Navy's Drag Queen "Harpy Daniels"...

Sailor by day, performer by night — meet the Navy’s drag queen, ‘Harpy Daniels’

9 posted on 08/28/2023 2:31:24 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (A person who seeks the truth with a strong bias will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Defending the country’s border and political system that recognizes natural rights to freedom, faith, expression is not a priority with these communists.

Much lower than real terrors like climate freakout, voterid, chromosomes, and of course -Trump!


10 posted on 08/28/2023 2:35:10 PM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FrankRizzo890
I wouldn't think so, but I admit I could be wrong. Those "ballons" are likely not stealthy, but I could be wrong there too. In 1978, we had radar that could spot a BB miles away, according to the book by the head of the Lockheed Skunk Works that built the F-117.

The guy who was calibrating the radar to do the testing brought his calibration gear in a briefcase, and it was a small box with various sizes of ball bearing in it used to calibrate the radar response.

But, as I readily admit, I suppose an object carried under a balloon that was non-radar reflecting, that was itself inside some kind of non-radar reflecting material, might escape detection. But that doesn't ring true to me.

11 posted on 08/28/2023 2:35:42 PM PDT by rlmorel ("If you think tough men are dangerous, just wait until you see what weak men are capable of." JBP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
Worth repeating from the article (extra paragraph breaks added by RR):
I managed to confirm a prominent example of a UAP incident that led NORAD to scramble F-15 fighter aircraft that was not reported to AARO or Congress. This case involved a high-flying fast vehicle that overflew a large area of the Western U.S in 2018. The craft was detected by FAA radars and its location was independently confirmed by commercial airline pilots. F-15s failed to get close to the object which, as far as we know, remains unidentified.

Yet, when I contacted AARO, the organization confirmed that this extraordinary case, which only came to light by chance, had not been reported to it by the Air Force. How many more cases like this have not been reported?

In light of that case and the Chinese balloon mishap, and the hundreds of ongoing unexplained UAP reports, I suggest Congress balance its focus on UAP with a hard look at the performance and effectiveness of the air and space surveillance systems that we rely on to protect the nation from surprise attacks like Pearl Harbor or September 11th.

The massive air and space surveillance systems funded by the taxpayer at huge expense include the most powerful radar emitters on the planet. They closely monitor vast regions of air and space 24 hours per day 365 days per year. It is technically inconceivable that these systems do not detect anomalies from time to time. They should certainly be seeing UAP independently of fighter aircraft, yet aside from the Chinese balloon and the 3 other objects shot down in the following days, I don’t know of any reports of that kind going to AARO or Congress.


12 posted on 08/28/2023 2:35:46 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (A person who seeks the truth with a strong bias will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Makes me grit my teeth.


13 posted on 08/28/2023 2:36:26 PM PDT by rlmorel ("If you think tough men are dangerous, just wait until you see what weak men are capable of." JBP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

If the Biden Government didn’t allow spy overflights, how could the Chinese, Russians, etc, verify the accuracy of military secrets the Bidens are selling them?


14 posted on 08/28/2023 2:38:33 PM PDT by jjotto ( Blessed are You LORD, who crushes enemies and subdues the wicked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

In China, the government spent $$ hundreds of billions per year on infrastructure, only to have found much of it was sub-standard, due to graft at all levels in the procurement process. The Chinese call it “tofu projects” - looks like cement, but is as fragile as tofu

Perhaps Americans similarly will discover that the $850 billion per year they spend on “defense” is a major source of political and deep-state graft, wasted on useless or substandard systems.

I’m in no position to judge on such highly technical, confidential, insider issues - but who would be? And how would we ever know?


15 posted on 08/28/2023 2:43:58 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

There wasn’t any money left after everyone took their cut.


16 posted on 08/28/2023 2:45:40 PM PDT by mountainlion (Live well those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Why? Because the big guy got his cut.


17 posted on 08/28/2023 2:52:12 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

1. UFOs — they outrun the jet fighters

2. Chinese balloons — the Chinese will not let Biden shoot them down

3. Drones — the Chinese will not let Biden shoot them down


18 posted on 08/28/2023 4:14:31 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

The radar operators were too busy butt humping to notice


19 posted on 08/28/2023 4:55:11 PM PDT by NWFree (Sigma male 🤪)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

This is what a hyper-corrupt third-world military looks like.


20 posted on 08/28/2023 5:02:06 PM PDT by Antoninus (Republicans are all honorable men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson