1 posted on
08/25/2023 8:41:00 PM PDT by
Jonty30
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: Jonty30
2 posted on
08/25/2023 8:42:49 PM PDT by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
To: Jonty30
4 posted on
08/25/2023 8:45:07 PM PDT by
NWFree
(Sigma male 🤪)
To: Jonty30
nothing,the rabbit runs one direction,the cat another,and the dog goes nuts
5 posted on
08/25/2023 8:45:35 PM PDT by
Craftmore
To: Jonty30
A rabbit bit my sister once.
6 posted on
08/25/2023 8:45:36 PM PDT by
Some Fat Guy in L.A.
(Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite its unfashionability)
To: Jonty30
7 posted on
08/25/2023 8:45:44 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(“Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose.”)
To: Jonty30
2 x (cat + rabbit) = (dog + rabbit)
dog = (24 - cat)
8 posted on
08/25/2023 8:47:14 PM PDT by
linMcHlp
To: Jonty30
10 posted on
08/25/2023 8:49:14 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Jonty30
Dog + Cat + Rabbit =27kg.
14 posted on
08/25/2023 8:50:29 PM PDT by
StormEye
To: Jonty30
I think this is correct:
rabbit = 20g - dog
cat = 10g - rabbit
dog = 24g - cat
rabbit = 20g - (24g - cat)
rabbit = 20g - 24g + cat
rabbit = 20g - 24g + 10g - rabbit
2 rabbits = 6g
rabbit = 3g
dog + cat = 24kg
dog + cat + rabbit = 27g
cat = 7g
dog = 17g
18 posted on
08/25/2023 8:52:59 PM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: Jonty30
19 posted on
08/25/2023 8:53:51 PM PDT by
Repeal The 17th
(Get out of the matrix and get a real life.)
To: Jonty30
Never happen unless they’re dead. Too much chaos otherwise.
To: Jonty30
59.52481 pounds. I used no algebra.
24 posted on
08/25/2023 8:57:21 PM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
("If you can’t say something nice . . . say the Rosary." [Red Badger])
To: Jonty30
29
Cat = 5
Rabbit = 5
Dog = 19
To: Jonty30
A dog and a cat weigh the same as a dog , a cat and a hair.
28 posted on
08/25/2023 9:02:00 PM PDT by
bunkerhill7
(Don't shoot until you see the whites of their lies)
To: Jonty30
To: Jonty30
The ‘standard’ way is to substitute into one equation from the others, eliminating all but one variable, then substituting that known back into the others, thus solving the simultaneous system, and thus the sum once all unknowns are known. A more elegant approach when the number of variables gets hard to handle like a million or so is inversion of the matrix of coefficients operating on the RHS of the system yielding the unknowns in one fell swoop. And yes D=17, C=7, R=3, and thus ÎŁ=27.
30 posted on
08/25/2023 9:04:44 PM PDT by
SpaceBar
To: Jonty30
I remember around fifth or sixth grade we would have puzzles like that and we would have to solve them by inspection because we didn't know symbolic algebra. Those problem drove me crazy. I suppose the really smart kids developed their own algebra to solve them.
I started learning symbolic notation in 8th grade, then, in ninth grade came Algebra 1 with simultaneous equations. Suddenly, things got SO much easier.
You posed a simple set of three simultaneous equations with three variables. Solve by successive substitution.

I went on to become a mechanical engineer. I might even remember how to ride a bike, too.
32 posted on
08/25/2023 9:08:56 PM PDT by
ProtectOurFreedom
(We are proles, they are nobility.)
To: Jonty30
C + R = 10
d + R = 20
d + c = 24
C+d+R=x
10 – c = 20 – d
d – c = 10
d+c=24
d = 10 + c
d = 24 – c
10+c = 24-c
2c=14
c=7
d=17
R=3
C+d+R=27
33 posted on
08/25/2023 9:09:28 PM PDT by
leopud
To: Jonty30
36 posted on
08/25/2023 9:14:11 PM PDT by
Sgt_Schultze
(When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves)
To: Jonty30
Use Wolfram’s Mathematica:
Solve[{c + r == 10, d + r == 20, d + c == 24}, {c, d, r}]
Output is {{c -> 7, d -> 17, r -> 3}}
Answer is 7+17+3 = 27
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson